this post was submitted on 06 Jan 2026
66 points (89.3% liked)
Asklemmy
52068 readers
468 users here now
A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions
Search asklemmy ๐
If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!
- Open-ended question
- Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
- Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
- Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
- An actual topic of discussion
Looking for support?
Looking for a community?
- Lemmyverse: community search
- sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
- !lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities
~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~
founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Is it not a reasonable grouping?
People who say the world is like this vs people who want to explore/discuss the way it is.
or
People who say the world is like this vs people who say the world is like that
In my opinion they are both valid groupings. The first one is much broader & less detailed.
No, you're an asshole because you're grouping people with their oppressors. Cloaking yourself in a faux civility and saying all opinions are equal is not cool.
OK, but being a victim doesn't make you immune to this categorization. A victim of sexual abuse who rapes someone is still a rapist. Someone who was persecuted for their race who then persecutes others for their race is still a racist. Victims don't get a "Get Out of Jail" card.
Would an atheist not group a christian extremist & muslim extremist together?