this post was submitted on 06 Jan 2026
143 points (100.0% liked)
Games
21195 readers
119 users here now
Tabletop, DnD, board games, and minecraft. Also Animal Crossing.
Rules
- No racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, or transphobia. Don't care if it's ironic don't post comments or content like that here.
- Mark spoilers
- No bad mouthing sonic games here :no-copyright:
- No gamers allowed :soviet-huff:
- No squabbling or petty arguments here. Remember to disengage and respect others choice to do so when an argument gets too much
- Anti-Edelgard von Hresvelg trolling will result in an immediate ban from c/games and submitted to the site administrators for review. :silly-liberator:
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Why is this here, this took some labor, who put this in and why did they do it? Everything is, in some shape, chekhov’s gun in invented worlds (aside from procedural generation, for obvious reason, although it also implies some things, be it in scope or nature of generation)
(Also, i would treat people who say they enjoyed every single chapter of ulysses with suspicion)
*like say lara croft, would first storyline work not in a forest, but in densely populated city? You can’t hunt there, you can’t murder your way through hordes of enemies etc, it would become uncharted basically. You can’t flashback to the dad when you are gunning down police forces, it’s a very silly “what if” but it shows limitations and possibilities by the chosen path of the game. Everything was a choice even if it looks like monolithic story. In that case, i suspect, they started from lara croft shivering in the woods and build the game from there, how they built it is another matter with some colonialism and orientalism sprinkled in, according to writers inclinations
Or take ftl, there is a choice made that the main opponents are exclusively humans, they just as well could be mix of aliens like you most likely are, or another species entirely. There is a lot of implied story there, even if the game doesn’t hit you with it.
Or something silly like skyrim shops decorations, there is a choice made in everything here, state of wares (broken/dirty/pristine), collection of them, state of the doors etc. some poor soul spend hours doing it and likely pondering, can they put this candle here if it’s named mage-guild-candle-final.3dasset
Also, as it’s my comfy watch lately, watch lord of the rings making, but not actors stuff, but set production/light grading/music or commentary of production/design. They talk quite a lot about selecting this precise decoration because it invokes blah blah, or selecting this color scheme because it looks like x, or selecting this musical instruments as implying y. Cause it was so heavily hand crafted movie (and entirely imaginary, so no real existing locations), there is a lot of behind the scenes expressed ideas, that you won’t notice or see talked about in movies made more digitally (at least interviews with cgi artists aren’t that thorough, even if the intent of artist is the same in scope, as they are drawing damn things, they typically trying to sell volume or whatever latest tech) or shot on real locations
*also, as a funny tidbit from lotr commentary watching during
times - peter jackson mentions zulu (1964) movie as an inspiration for helm's deep, so you can take from that what you will, the story line of that movie is something.
I can't remember where the saying originated, but the idea was "everything you see in a film (or game) is there for a reason, even if it's an accident". Whatever you see and experience is going to ultimately affect your view of a work
I really enjoy this analysis of media, looking at authorial intent (designer/programmer placing of items or assets to draw the eye, to inspire an emotion) vs diegetic intent (why did the wizard shop display the item like this 🤔), and filling the gaps
Yeah, it’s kinda more material, but also a lot of more symbolic analysis flows from this. while redditors can argue about curtains, they do obviously say something about author themselves, i wouldn’t mention curtains in describing room at all, but rather colors and textures of walls and floors, it doesn’t matter author thinks it’s perfectly normal to mention them, it still says something that they are there