this post was submitted on 05 Jan 2026
641 points (99.7% liked)

PC Gaming

13123 readers
554 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com 53 points 4 days ago (1 children)

They really segmented that market in the worst possible way, 2 cores and 4 cores only, possibility to use vms or overclock, and so on. Add windoze eating up every +5%/year.

Remember buying the 2600(maybe X) and it was soo fast.

[–] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 25 points 4 days ago (3 children)

The 2600k was exceptionally good and was relevant well past the normal upgrade timeframes.

Really it only got left behind because of its 4C/8T limit as everything started supporting lots of threads instead of just a couple, and just being a 2nd Generation i7.

[–] Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 day ago

Yes, that was a beast! I was poor and had to wait and got the generation after, the 3770K and already the segmentation was there, I got overlooking possibilities but not the VM stuff...

[–] guynamedzero@piefed.zeromedia.vip 7 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Coincidentally, that’s the exact cpu I use in my server! And it runs pretty damn well.

[–] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 7 points 4 days ago (1 children)

At this point the only "issue" with it is power usage versus processing capability. Newer chips can do the same with less power.

Yeahhh, iirc it uses slightly less power than my main cpu for significantly less performance

[–] Trainguyrom@reddthat.com 5 points 4 days ago

Really it only got left behind because of its 4C/8T limit as everything started supporting lots of threads instead of just a couple, and just being a 2nd Generation i7.

Past me made the accidentally more financially prudent move of opting for the i7-4790k over the i5-4690k which ultimately lasted me nearly a decade. At the time the advice was of course "4 cores is all you need, don't waste the money on an i7" but those 4 extra threads made all the difference in the longevity of that PC