this post was submitted on 05 Jan 2026
133 points (100.0% liked)

news

24526 readers
653 users here now

Welcome to c/news! We aim to foster a book-club type environment for discussion and critical analysis of the news. Our policy objectives are:

We ask community members to appreciate the uncertainty inherent in critical analysis of current events, the need to constantly learn, and take part in the community with humility. None of us are the One True Leftist, not even you, the reader.

Newcomm and Newsmega Rules:

The Hexbear Code of Conduct and Terms of Service apply here.

  1. Link titles: Please use informative link titles. Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed.

  2. Content warnings: Posts on the newscomm and top-level replies on the newsmega should use content warnings appropriately. Please be thoughtful about wording and triggers when describing awful things in post titles.

  3. Fake news: No fake news posts ever, including April 1st. Deliberate fake news posting is a bannable offense. If you mistakenly post fake news the mod team may ask you to delete/modify the post or we may delete it ourselves.

  4. Link sources: All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. If you are citing a Twitter post as news, please include the Xcancel.com (or another Nitter instance) or at least strip out identifier information from the twitter link. There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance, such as Libredirect or archive them as you would any other reactionary source.

  5. Archive sites: We highly encourage use of non-paywalled archive sites (i.e. archive.is, web.archive.org, ghostarchive.org) so that links are widely accessible to the community and so that reactionary sources don’t derive data/ad revenue from Hexbear users. If you see a link without an archive link, please archive it yourself and add it to the thread, ask the OP to fix it, or report to mods. Including text of articles in threads is welcome.

  6. Low effort material: Avoid memes/jokes/shitposts in newscomm posts and top-level replies to the newsmega. This kind of content is OK in post replies and in newsmega sub-threads. We encourage the community to balance their contribution of low effort material with effort posts, links to real news/analysis, and meaningful engagement with material posted in the community.

  7. American politics: Discussion and effort posts on the (potential) material impacts of American electoral politics is welcome, but the never-ending circus of American Politics© Brought to You by Mountain Dew™ is not welcome. This refers to polling, pundit reactions, electoral horse races, rumors of who might run, etc.

  8. Electoralism: Please try to avoid struggle sessions about the value of voting/taking part in the electoral system in the West. c/electoralism is right over there.

  9. AI Slop: Don't post AI generated content. Posts about AI race/chip wars/data centers are fine.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MohammedTheCommunistPalestinian@hexbear.net 31 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I wanna know if they'd do it with Mexico , a country with Liberal elections

[–] TraschcanOfIdeology@hexbear.net 37 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

The consent manufacturing machine has been working to that effect since Sheinbaum took office. If you speak to any right-wing Mexican they'll tell you that Sheinbaum is in cahoots with the cartels (which ones? no idea) because the streets are not overflowing with blood like during the Calderon administration. It's been repeated so much that it's considered truth to some degree by most people outside of Mexico.

[–] MohammedTheCommunistPalestinian@hexbear.net 20 points 1 week ago (1 children)

My Mexican friend supported her before the election and she Monera generally improved Mexico and that the majority of Mexicans agree

[–] TraschcanOfIdeology@hexbear.net 20 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

The consensus among my leftist Mexican friends is one of critical support, because Morena has been consistently terrible when it comes to Indigenous Peoples' rights, environmental issues, and prioritizing large urban areas at the expense of rural Mexico. This is my position as well.

When asking Mexican Media or my Mexican acquiantances who are not as politically literate as my friends, she's corrupt and bought by the cartels. Every politician is, but she's soft on crime and the cartels. Working class Mexicans I know admit it's been better, but they're not full believers, because politics is only for corrupt people.

[–] Grapho@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

My complaints would be less along those lines (because thats the bogus line that whitexican libs love) and more along the lines of the usual comprador bullshit, regressive taxation that affects working professionals instead of financial speculators, lackluster funding of healthcare/transportation and stupid MBA bullshit within IMSS, lack of local level anti-corruption institutions and protectionism in favor of US companies while acting like it's to protect Mexican jobs.

It's honestly mostly the protectionism and the lack of local accountability, because most of that shit would be solved , I swear to god local politicians jump from the corrupt ass PRI and it's like they've been baptized in the holy spirit of morena which somehow absolves them of adhering to a national strategy of development or even having to sort of hide the usual blatant embezzlement.

Not saying the first part is completely false but you can see a clear and marked progression unlike those I pointed out which seem to be one step forward and two steps back.

[–] TraschcanOfIdeology@hexbear.net 1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

because thats the bogus line that whitexican libs love

I'll tell my campesino and indigenous friends and their orgs they're whitexican because they have complaints about the Mexican gvmnt, specifically about the way their land is handled, and how they're being abandoned unless there is something to extract from there in the name of 'progress'. I am not Mexican, and haven't lived there in years, so i'm missing a lot of reality on the ground, particularly what you mention, but dismissing those concerns as "whitexican" shit is really reductive and erases the reality of some of the most vulnerable and vocal people in Mexico who have spent decades demanding their rights be upheld.

The lack of local accountability seems to be endemic to most local politics throughout latam though. Parties and party lines stop existing at the municipal and regional level, and local power brokers change parties like they change socks, only to allow for the graft to keep going. It seems that many leftist parties/governments struggle with maintaining discipline at the micro level, because they focus so much on national and parliamentary politics.

[–] Beaver@hexbear.net 16 points 1 week ago

My theory is that the "Maduro is in cahoots with the Cartels" line was specifically to prepare the public for when that line is used as a justification for couping Sheinbaum.

[–] Evilsandwichman@hexbear.net 16 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I think the cartel may have a few opinions on that; would be hilarious if they start releasing some of their more horrific videos but the victims are American troops

[–] Keld@hexbear.net 39 points 1 week ago (2 children)

If you think the cartels are going to turn patriotic and defend the motherland from their primary customers you are quite the optimist

[–] invalidusernamelol@hexbear.net 30 points 1 week ago

The cartels are the stay behinds. They're the ones that the US would put in power.

[–] ColombianLenin@hexbear.net 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Lumpens only care about their money. If the US bombs the cartels they will absolutely flip on a dime and attack US troops. It would get really bloody at the border. The cartels are pretty much as armed as the state.

[–] Keld@hexbear.net 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The cartels being motivated entirely by money is why they would turn on their primary customers?

[–] ColombianLenin@hexbear.net 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

They not only supply the US but Europe as well. Either way, a cartel would fight back the US government if they get droned same way they would do any rival.

The consumers are the US upper middle class for cocaine and the working class for fentanyl and meth, not specifically the US government per se. If the state becomes a liability then it becomes a target.

As much as I hate his guts, see Pablo Escobar

[–] Grapho@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Pablo Escobar was one among many Colombian drug capos, and he had been one in a long list of former CIA operators that were deemed more trouble than they're worth and had to be put down like the rabid dogs they were handsomely paid to be. The right wing militias that killed Escobar's men weren't arming themselves, nor were they getting sponsorships out of the kindness of the US government.

Narcos in all of Latin America are just Operation Gladio with a different coat of paint.

[–] ColombianLenin@hexbear.net 6 points 1 week ago

Yes, but as with all US puppets, some of them end up biting back when they figure out they have been hung to dry. See Al Qaeda, ISIS, or the Ukranians.

these people are usually sell outs but a man can dream

[–] lemmyseizethemeans@lemmygrad.ml 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Chile just elected the son of a Nazi who is pro Israel

I get you are referring to the 73 coup