this post was submitted on 03 Jan 2026
80 points (100.0% liked)

politics

22931 readers
172 users here now

Protests, dual power, and even electoralism.

Labour and union posts go to The Labour Community.

Take any slop posts to the slop trough

Main is good for shitposting.

Do not post direct links to reactionary sites.

Off topic posts will be removed.

Follow the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember we're all comrades here.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemdro.id/post/34242793

Does Venezuela have no army at all?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] a_party_german@hexbear.net 13 points 1 week ago (2 children)

100% the only way to guarantee sovereignty is nukes.

Mark Ames talked about this in the latest RWN. His main counterpoints:

  • India and Pakistan fought a small war in 2025 - both have nukes
  • Iran fired hundreds of ballistic missiles at Israel, a nuclear power
  • Russia probably would have invaded Ukraine even if they had nukes, it was just that existential for them
  • the nuke argument really only works for the DPRK, and maybe they're just not important enough for the empire to bother

Anyway if you want to listen for yourself, here is the episode:

https://www.podbean.com/media/share/dir-vua6p-29edd699

[–] CarmineCatboy2@hexbear.net 12 points 1 week ago

The third and fourth points are just hand-wavey aren't they? 'Russia would have invaded Ukraine anyways' is rich coming from them - RWN also though Russia wasn't going to invade at all back in the day. Moreover, what sort of counter-factual is 'the empire just doesn't care all that much about North Korea'? Are we going to say that about every country between Cuba and Iran until the US actually goes ahead and escalates its wars against them?

If Ukraine losing a fourth of its territory isn't existential enough to raise the risk of nuclear war then, well, at that point you might as well argue that nukes are useless actually and nobody is ever gonna fire one. I for one thing it is much more convincing to argue that Israel - backed by the US - did not feel existentially threatened by Iran and that neither did India or Pakistan in their small war.

[–] notmyoldaccount@hexbear.net 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The horrifying reality is that nukes are just another tool in an arsenal of war and not a magic game over device that is too evil to use. It is not a magical deterrent and the empires are more than willing to shoulder a little nuclear hellfire to achieve their goals.

When empire is 4 businesses in a trench coat, and those businesses get to make the call, they can protect themselves from the fallout.