this post was submitted on 03 Jan 2026
254 points (100.0% liked)

news

24538 readers
716 users here now

Welcome to c/news! We aim to foster a book-club type environment for discussion and critical analysis of the news. Our policy objectives are:

We ask community members to appreciate the uncertainty inherent in critical analysis of current events, the need to constantly learn, and take part in the community with humility. None of us are the One True Leftist, not even you, the reader.

Newcomm and Newsmega Rules:

The Hexbear Code of Conduct and Terms of Service apply here.

  1. Link titles: Please use informative link titles. Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed.

  2. Content warnings: Posts on the newscomm and top-level replies on the newsmega should use content warnings appropriately. Please be thoughtful about wording and triggers when describing awful things in post titles.

  3. Fake news: No fake news posts ever, including April 1st. Deliberate fake news posting is a bannable offense. If you mistakenly post fake news the mod team may ask you to delete/modify the post or we may delete it ourselves.

  4. Link sources: All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. If you are citing a Twitter post as news, please include the Xcancel.com (or another Nitter instance) or at least strip out identifier information from the twitter link. There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance, such as Libredirect or archive them as you would any other reactionary source.

  5. Archive sites: We highly encourage use of non-paywalled archive sites (i.e. archive.is, web.archive.org, ghostarchive.org) so that links are widely accessible to the community and so that reactionary sources don’t derive data/ad revenue from Hexbear users. If you see a link without an archive link, please archive it yourself and add it to the thread, ask the OP to fix it, or report to mods. Including text of articles in threads is welcome.

  6. Low effort material: Avoid memes/jokes/shitposts in newscomm posts and top-level replies to the newsmega. This kind of content is OK in post replies and in newsmega sub-threads. We encourage the community to balance their contribution of low effort material with effort posts, links to real news/analysis, and meaningful engagement with material posted in the community.

  7. American politics: Discussion and effort posts on the (potential) material impacts of American electoral politics is welcome, but the never-ending circus of American Politics© Brought to You by Mountain Dew™ is not welcome. This refers to polling, pundit reactions, electoral horse races, rumors of who might run, etc.

  8. Electoralism: Please try to avoid struggle sessions about the value of voting/taking part in the electoral system in the West. c/electoralism is right over there.

  9. AI Slop: Don't post AI generated content. Posts about AI race/chip wars/data centers are fine.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ExotiqueMatter@lemmygrad.ml 24 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Trump talks shit a lot of the time but it would be an immense public embarrassment for his administration if he falsely claimed that he had kidnapped Maduro so I’m very much inclined to believe this on the face of it, without any evidence to support or dispute the claim.

I thought of that after I posted this comment, and yea, that would be a big lie to tell even for him.

The question, though, is how badly will this affect Venezuelan resistance? Hopefully that doesn't cripples the socialists for one, I'm concerned about how this might help comprador reactionary and traitor forces. Also, how well can they defend themselves, on one hand having aircrafts over the capital isn't a supremely good look for the country's air defense capability, on the other hand Caracas is basically right on the coast so aircrafts coming from the sea would probably (I assume) reach it very shortly after detection making it easier to get shots in before a response can be scrambled. How far in the territory can American aircrafts go before they're in serious trouble?

[–] ReadFanon@hexbear.net 29 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The question, though, is how badly will this affect Venezuelan resistance?

Very hard to tell and I think it's going to be largely contingent on the Venezuelan military response. The colectivos are armed and trained but they are militias and they aren't likely to be able to resist in a significant way without Venezuelan military support, especially if the military turns on them.

If it was a full-blown Afghanistan style occupation then the colectivos could be expected to be very useful as an insurgent force but I don't think this one is a fight they are big enough to take on so as it stands currently, I think the vast majority of the resistance would come from the Venezuelan military, which appears not to have fired a single shot.

How far in the territory can American aircrafts go before they're in serious trouble?

Honestly, I'm not a military guy I'm a geopolitics girlie so I can't say anything authoritatively in this respect but it's hard to imagine a Venezuelan military with air defence capabilities enough to resist the US. If they went all-in on drones and prepared for a pitched battle then it's possible that there would be strong resistance but I don't know how realistic that would have been.

Venezuela isn't renowned for its military capacity and their military, at least historically, has a tendency towards disloyalty so I'm not that hopeful about their capacity to pose much resistance at this stage.

[–] newacctidk@hexbear.net 8 points 2 weeks ago

Are they even going to try anything? The US went in and out, not like there are troops stationed for Venezuela to attack. They would need to futilely hit the fleet which would just mean more bombings. Maduro was the target and he needed to be in a bunker deep underground.

[–] Mardoniush@hexbear.net 26 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

The Venezuelan Government is probably initially stable and capable of at least resisting a coup. Additionally no one likes armed missionaries, and the left wing groups opposed to Maduro may well coalesce around the government now he's not in the picture.

Even in the best case for the USA, it's a bloody civil war.

As for air defence it's hard to defend if you're not expecting a full scale attack imminently. It's hard to keep an s300 ready. If Venezuela still has significant air defence assets any further US incursions will be difficult