this post was submitted on 02 Jan 2026
215 points (97.8% liked)

News

33960 readers
3077 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Lapses in safeguards led to wave of sexualized images this week as xAI says it is working to improve systems

Elon Musk’s chatbot Grok posted on Friday that lapses in safeguards had led it to generate “images depicting minors in minimal clothing” on social media platform X. The chatbot, a product of Musk’s company xAI, has been generating a wave of sexualized images throughout the week in response to user prompts.

Screenshots shared by users on X showed Grok’s public media tab filled with such images. xAI said it was working to improve its systems to prevent future incidents.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 57 points 4 days ago (3 children)

I am more and more convinced that it was projection when Musk called the diver that rescued children for e pedo when he criticized Musk for being in the way when Musk tried to make a stunt out of the rescue mission.

[–] dreadbeef@lemmy.dbzer0.com 31 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

that was probably my turning point on the guy, if not earlier. As soon as I saw how he handled all of that, it reeked of rich arrogance. He didn't do jack shit and made it about himself and increasing his net worth.

[–] Insekticus@aussie.zone 13 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Yeah same. Before that I didnt think much of him (just wasnt as aware of him as a person) and then after that whole diver pedo incident I was like "wtf? What kind of mature response to a diving crisis in a third world country"?

And after that I just kept watching from a distance as he did infrequent but stupid stunts (like sending a car into space; you may as well light a few million dollars on fire in front of some poor people and say "look how rich I am".

And after that I just thought the guy was a twat. Until his government days, and now I fucking despise the cunt and cant wait to hear about his downfall in his friends' tabloid rags online.

[–] TheWeirdestCunt@lemmy.today 5 points 3 days ago

Tbf when they sent the car up they were required to send a test payload anyway to certify the rocket for commercial use. If it wasn't a car it would've been the equivalent weight but as a block of lead or steel.

[–] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 14 points 4 days ago (3 children)

I wonder if there's something about being a billionaire that just drives you to pedophilia. Maybe when you already have so much money that you can effectively do whatever you want, and you know that people like you don't ever face justice? Maybe sleeping with minors is like the ultimate taboo, the thing you do simply to fundamentally show how different you are from the common rabble. You can fuck 12 year olds and get away with it. Maybe it's a sick thrill to people who otherwise have very little novelty or joy in their lives.

[–] kadu@scribe.disroot.org 17 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I wonder if there's something about being a billionaire that just drives you to pedophilia.

Indeed, there are two major factors. The first is that the human brain is built to adapt it's baseline to your context, which means that for you and I eating a $15000 dinner made by France's best chef would blow us away, but if you get to eat like that everyday at home... it suddenly becomes just as normal as whatever sandwich you ate last week, and I don't mean "Yeah it's still mind blowing, but you want something else", it quite literally gets re-normalized so that first taste will never be achievable again. So billionaires go around wasting the experience of everything they can buy: food, comfort, travel, fame, competitions... and sex, and then they crave the next thing they haven't tasted yet, the more difficult to find, the more restricted, the more hidden, the more illegal... the better.

The second factor is that you don't get to be a billionaire if you're not a sociopath. There's simply no other way, anybody with a sliver of empathy would not be able to become one, which also means they're extremely likely to see abuse as valid if it's for their own benefit.

The combination of both factors, together with the money necessary to escape the consequences, is a pedophilia machine.

[–] leadore@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

The second factor is that you don’t get to be a billionaire if you’re not a sociopath.

I think it's your second factor that's most relevant.

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Nah, you can look up the sex offender list in your area and see plenty of non-wealthy people. Money is just an enabler. But yeah, I'm sure part of it is "always been this way and now they can act on it" and part is "I've paid all the supermodels I want, I need something new". Kind of like the Saudi princes and all the really fucked-up stuff they do.

[–] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago

There's wealthy and then there's wealthy. How many billionaires are on the sex offender registry? You don't really reach "above the law" levels of wealth until you start reaching that level.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

That sounds like something that could actually be true.

[–] Kirp123@lemmy.world 11 points 3 days ago

He did appear in the Epstein files a bunch.