this post was submitted on 31 Dec 2025
88 points (95.8% liked)

Slop.

753 readers
446 users here now

For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Do not try to circumvent these restrictions by vague posting or bringing it up later in another thread.

And in other areas doing it as end of a reply that could be taken as an attack/making fun of them.

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

Where did I vague post about or bring up damascusart later?

[–] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)
[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

Ah, nice goalpost moving. Probably double-checked and realized your initial gotcha didn't work.

Anyway, that's our instance. That doesn't have the same disengage rules as yours. Leaving a neutral comment along with the disengage isn't against our rules.

[–] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Ah, nice goalpost moving. Probably double-checked and realized your initial gotcha didn't work.

Says the one who didn't know the hexbear disengage rules.

That wasn't a neutral comment but you love to do that when it's in your favor

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

Says the one who didn't know the hexbear disengage rules.

Says the one who correctly used the disengage rule in hexbear, while those multiple hexbears blatantly disrespecting it (again, in hexbear) don't get any trouble, which is typical hypocrisy for hexbears and their cliquish shite.

Looks like I was right on the money on the failed "gotcha" too

That wasn't a neutral comment but you love to do that when it's in your favor

Agree to disagree. I left it as a lighthearted "I don't understand wtf you're on about". And it's not like I banned someone from replying to that disengage either.

[–] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 hour ago

If you want to be pedantic then you technically haven't used disengage here as it does need to be an acknowledgement of disengagement and leaving said thread as you haven't. You're use can be considered, if we're being pedantic like you want to be, saying the other needs to not you triggering the rule.

Agree to disagree. I left it as a lighthearted "I don't understand wtf you're on about". And it's not like I banned someone from replying to that disengage either.

Was definitely calling them out then doing mic drop you can't argue.

Says the one who correctly used the disengage rule in hexbear, while those multiple hexbears blatantly disrespecting it (again, in hexbear) don't get any trouble, which is typical hypocrisy for hexbears and their cliquish shite.

Again going back to the not following it and then not even respecting it. I saw what 1 user bringing it up before hand but sure say it's all hexbear