this post was submitted on 02 Jan 2026
246 points (99.2% liked)

News

33868 readers
2839 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

If there was any hope New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani would inch towards the middle or appeal to moderate Democrats as he launched his administration, it vanished in the bitter January air that ushered in the start of his term.

During his inaugural address Thursday, Mamdani sought to send a clear message: That the left had won the hard-fought race for mayor, and his administration is now intent on showing the rest of the country that progressive liberals can, in fact, govern.

At a time of deep political division across the US, Mamdani stuck to his political identity and ideology, reminding the crowd he had been “elected as a democratic socialist,” promising to “govern as a democratic socialist” and castigating the politics of complacency and the political establishment for failing its constituency.

It was an unapologetically progressive speech, in which Mamdani framed the mainstream Democratic party as one that lacked imagination and ambition. Then, he vowed to not “abandon my principles for fear of being deemed radical.”

“In writing this address, I have been told that this is the occasion to reset expectations, that I should use this opportunity to encourage the people of New York to ask for little and expect even less,” he said. “I will do no such thing. The only expectation I seek to reset is that of small expectations.”

Mamdani also tried to strike a unifying tone. He spoke directly to opponents and critics who remain skeptical the 34-year-old former state assemblyman will be able to run the largest city in the nation and enact an agenda many consider too liberal and unrealistic.

Mamdani has proposed taxing the city’s wealthiest residents and raising the corporate tax rate – moves that would require the support of the state legislature and the governor – to pay for his signature agenda items: universal childcare, “fast and free” city buses and enacting a rent freeze for rent stabilized tenants.

“If you are a New Yorker, I am your mayor,” Mamdani told the crowd. “Regardless of whether we agree, I will protect you, celebrate with you, mourn alongside you and never, not for a second, hide from you.”

Mamdani’s focus on working-class New Yorkers was peppered throughout his speech. He spoke of taxi drivers and restaurant servers, hospital workers and subway operators, describing people who work in the shadows and often go unnoticed while struggling to stay afloat.

Shortly before addressing the crowd, a duo performed the “Bread and Roses” anthem –– the title a nod to a political slogan that became a rallying cry for workers’ rights in 1912. The imagery is meant to symbolize people’s need for basic necessities, but also beauty. In choosing the performance, Mamdani’s administration appeared to try and tell New Yorkers it was possible to have both.

“What’s radical is a system which gives so much to so few and denies so many people the basic necessities of life,” Mamdani said, quoting Independent Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders, who administered Mamdani’s public oath of office. Sanders praised New Yorkers and Mamdani for giving hope and inspiration to “people all over this country.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works 28 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (3 children)

Hey remember just last week how people thought he was going back on his promises?

I don’t think this is proof for the opposite, but I’m still in the camp of: “let’s see what he actually does before we judge”.

Edit: after reading the article, this part jumped out at me

Mamdani’s election in November sparked a debate about whether the national Democratic party should shift leftward, focus on issues affecting the working class and specifically target voters by highlighting affordability, especially in the upcoming midterm elections.

As apposed to what exactly? Isn’t making things more affordable like the ideal goal for most politicians? They are almost saying the quiet part out loud.

[–] Davel23@fedia.io 12 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Isn’t making things more affordable like the ideal goal for most politicians?

In a perfect world, yes. In our world, politics is about gaining and holding on to as much power over people as possible.

[–] Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Oh I get that, but what is odd is the way CNN phrased it, as if their readers dread poor people being able to afford a good life.

[–] Witchfire@lemmy.world 8 points 1 hour ago

CNN got bought out by a Republican a while ago

[–] curbstickle@anarchist.nexus 2 points 1 hour ago

Isn’t making things more affordable like the ideal goal for most politicians?

Nope.

The ideal goal for most politicians is whatever makes their base happy. If youre the mayor of Scarsdale, NY, where the mean household income is $600k, affordability is the opposite of what its residents want, and they are the ones voting for the mayor.

Similarly, if the ones funding your election and can influence the outcome are the ones ripping off renters (Cuomo), affordability for rentals is a talking point at most, and of zero interest when it comes to actual legislation or efforts by the admin.

[–] SLVRDRGN@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

Here's an example of something I came across: Link
Fixing the Property Tax System, dealing with landlordship in New York, working with City Council to pass the Community Opportunity to Purchase Act (COPA), which gives qualified mission-driven nonprofits a first right to purchase multifamily buildings when landlords sell... there's a lot being attempted here.