Asklemmy

52048 readers

428 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
!lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 6 years ago

MODERATORS

How might political bias affect the future of AI-generated content? (reddthat.com)

submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by PumpkinDrama@reddthat.com to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

7 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I believe that because Reddit is generally left-leaning and the majority of those users are opposed to AI, we may see a disproportionate rise in AI-generated right-wing content, which could influence public opinion. And the pentagon also showed interest in using LLMs to gaslight people.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] mesamunefire@piefed.social 3 points 1 week ago

Not 100% on the same topic, but in the software development world we are seeing this quite often. Because there is a bias for react and python on the original pull for ai, there is a deluge of new projects with those two stacks because people ask ai for software...and those two pop up.

In the same way, the talking points for ai will seem wierdly stick in a certain year/decade because that's where most of the talking points were pulled from.