this post was submitted on 01 Jan 2026
75 points (73.0% liked)

Mildly Infuriating

43444 readers
376 users here now

Home to all things "Mildly Infuriating" Not infuriating, not enraging. Mildly Infuriating. All posts should reflect that. Please post actually infuriating posts to !actually_infuriating@lemmy.world

I want my day mildly ruined, not completely ruined. Please remember to refrain from reposting old content. If you post a post from reddit it is good practice to include a link and credit the OP. I'm not about stealing content!

It's just good to get something in this website for casual viewing whilst refreshing original content is added overtime.


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means: -No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...


7. Content should match the theme of this community.


-Content should be Mildly infuriating. If your post better fits !Actually_Infuriating put it there.

-The Community !actuallyinfuriating has been born so that's where you should post the big stuff.

...


8. Reposting of Reddit content is permitted, try to credit the OC.


-Please consider crediting the OC when reposting content. A name of the user or a link to the original post is sufficient.

...

...


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Lemmy Review

2.Lemmy Be Wholesome

3.Lemmy Shitpost

4.No Stupid Questions

5.You Should Know

6.Credible Defense


Reach out to LillianVS for inclusion on the sidebar.

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Waking up every day and drinking that Hatorade.

If you don't like anything on the the platform, why stick around?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 48 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (4 children)

f____g@lemmy.zip?

I have no idea who that is - your alt?

Downvoting is valid. You saying it equals hate says more about you than about the downvoters.

edit: hm, apparently this is about the user doing the downvoting, not being downvoted? Still, this is badly anonymized, and that's my main point.

[–] MelodiousFunk@slrpnk.net 12 points 8 hours ago

I have no idea who that is

I know exactly who this is, even without the username tip-off. Here's what their record looked like in September:

I happened across the user when looking into a string of -1's on brand new posts in a small community. They were all the same person, and that person downvoted 244 times for each upvote.

This on its own is not normal behavior. Combine it with this user's comments - which are pretty much completely on brand for the average Lemmy user - and it becomes even more bizarre.

[–] Tetsuo@jlai.lu 31 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (1 children)

My instance of choice decided to unilaterally and without any warning whatsoever disable downvotes. Just to "try it out".

I'm still pissed about it to this day.

I mean that google removes any kind of downvotes is one stupid thing, but that people think this makes content "better" is crazy to me.

Now I do understand that in small communities the weight of a super negative account can be quite an issue.. But is removing completely any negative feedback the solution ? Really, it's all we got ?

Also the simple fact that a lot of this community is from Reddit, IMO it's not okay to disable a feature like that without even voting on it.

So if you think disabling negative feedback fixes an issue, you have the burden to prove or at least explain the reasoning.

I do think it didn't make YouTube any less of a cesspool to disable downvotes on it...

Edit : Also while votes are not supposed to replace moderation, they certainly help limiting the reach of spammers. Like if the mods are asleep at least the community can bury the post in the meantime. But no, they just disabled downvotes and made a post about the change the same day. Wtf.

[–] lazynooblet@lazysoci.al 9 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Change instance. Loads to choose from.

[–] CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works 3 points 6 hours ago

Yeah thats what I was going to say too. There's little keeping you on any specific instance. You don't have "karma totals" like on reddit.

[–] gedaliyah@lemmy.world 11 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Nothing against downvoting in general, but some people are extremely toxic about it. I don't get the point.

Please don't do a witch hunt - it was censored for a reason. Sorry I didn't do it thoroughly enough.

[–] A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 5 points 10 hours ago

Please don’t do a witch hunt - it was censored for a reason. Sorry I didn’t do it thoroughly enough.

I'm not. But if this post should evolve into one, that's on you. Do the sensible thing and remove it.

[–] A_A@lemmy.world 2 points 11 hours ago

i concur (approved your p.of.view)
I like Lemmy(*)s, and like to ↑ good stuff and to ↓ at very bad stuff. Yes, of course, there is so much of both in here. And since we have many communities, it is possible for opposite points of view to float upward. Until we have a better system, let's use what we have.