this post was submitted on 30 Dec 2025
225 points (99.6% liked)
movies
2360 readers
384 users here now
A community about movies and cinema.
Related communities:
- !television@piefed.social
- !homevideo@feddit.uk
- !mediareviews@lemmy.world
- !casualconversation@piefed.social
Rules
- Be civil
- No discrimination or prejudice of any kind
- Do not spam
- Stay on topic
- These rules will evolve as this community grows
No posts or comments will be removed without an explanation from mods.
founded 9 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
People here like to ignore the article and just start rambling about random things. If we're talking about AI coming up with completely novel concepts, being creative in in some philosophical sense or being able to create beautiful art then of course you're right. AI does not operate like people and is not able to replicate the way human creativity works.
But this article is about Disney using AI to generate SciFi animals to use in a background of a movie. You don't need to be a creative genius and push the boundaries of art to do this. SciFi movies done by people don't do this. They usually use caricatures of animals/people with recognizable but exaggerated features mixed in random ways. AI is perfectly capable of doing this. The video they used was terrible but it doesn't mean AI couldn't create a better example.
Basically, the article is not about achieving human level creativity in cinema so saying that AI can't do it is besides the point.
Don't change the subject. I'm not talking about the article, I'm criticizing your logic and take.
I was always taking about the article. Because it's a post about an article. If someone is talking about something else than they changed the subject. If you want to talk about something else feel free to make a post about different article. I will read it and tell you what I think.