this post was submitted on 30 Dec 2025
613 points (95.0% liked)

Microblog Memes

9985 readers
2018 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] Wren@lemmy.today 3 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (1 children)

Why don't you trust their metrics? If you don't think the tests were accurate measurements, what would work better?

They used neurolinguistics and neural pathway mapping, there's a whole section on it.

Testing one thing by no means implies any other method wouldn't have proven the same thing. That's... that's not how studies work. They're testing the efficacy of their methods.

That's the hypothesis, not a thesis.

[โ€“] mirshafie@europe.pub 0 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

I think that if you say

In clinical settings, it may serve as an intervention to increase emotional awareness and empathy among individuals who have engaged in harassment, with the aim of modifying their behavior.

then you need your metrics to control for, among other things, "individuals who have engaged in harassment"

But they're not just testing efficacy either. They're making a qualitative statement that VR has certain special characteristics when it comes to aiding empathy. That's a claim that absolutely need to be contrasted against other media, and it's absolutely "how studies work".