this post was submitted on 30 Dec 2025
35 points (100.0% liked)
Slop.
760 readers
576 users here now
For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.
Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.
Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.
Rule 3: No sectarianism.
Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome
Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.
Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.
Rule 7: Do not individually target federated instances' admins or moderators.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
God damn, this guy sucks though. I knew Verso had some of these types based on the stuff they put out, but didn't know annoying-types like this were so high up in it.
Edit: Also, it's not as if Furr hasn't responded to the stupid Greene critique.
https://msuweb.montclair.edu/~furrg/research/gfgreenecrit0125.html
Actually reading Furr, and more importantly understanding who Furr is, really wiped a lot of my illusions about dipshit western leftists and anti-Stalinism. Their actual criticisms almost always amount to cherrypicking his claims to discount all of them atop very obviously bad arguments like saying the only people who can write about history are people holding phd's in history when the guy's a medieval literature professor, he's taken history courses as well as his writing is based on looking at and presenting documents in keeping with writing standards on history.
You can tell it touches a nerve because of all the fucking r/badhistory, r/askhistorians, etc. dogshit threads by liberal types who are fucking pissed anyone would even attempt to look at a lot of the claims made about the USSR and Stalin and run to find some authority to coo them back to complacency.
I think Furr makes good arguments in some cases and he obviously has a massive amount of knowledge about the Soviet archives and the like, but I think that he does also make some silly arguments, like what he says about Katyn.
Edit: Also, Jesus fucking Christ, why are his webpages so unreadable that they can't even display an apostrophe?
What do you mean? Furr is wrong to say the Nazis did the massacre?
Right, the Soviets did the massacre (though perhaps the number is slightly inflated for various reasons). The people massacred were military officers, members of the Polish upper class who the Soviets identified as a serious hazard, because they were very liable to side with the Nazis over the communists, and after interrogating many of them and separating out the ones they identified as not being hazards, they killed the remainder, which was several thousand people.
I am inclined to say that there were better solutions, that the officers could surely have been sent to Siberia or something, but that it wasn't just the Soviets killing for fun or for a punitive purpose, much less some of the other ridiculous motivations sometimes ascribed to the event (like "attacking Polish culture" because the officers were upper class and therefore disproportionately academics, etc. outside of their military careers).
Just a classist chump who thinks the peasantry ain't shit even though the peasantry has a much better track record than the proletariat in overthrowing their oppressors.