this post was submitted on 29 Dec 2025
384 points (99.0% liked)

politics

26881 readers
1996 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The president had yet another strange mark on his hands over Christmas, once again raising concerns that his health is not what he has claimed it to be.

Donald Trump—the oldest person to ever be elected president—was photographed with what appeared to be another bruise on Christmas Eve, this time marring his left hand.

The 79-year-old has repeatedly claimed that he is in pristine condition, brushing off public alarm over his deteriorating body.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] WindyRebel@lemmy.world 39 points 7 hours ago (4 children)

I am commenting just because I take issue with the headline. The bruise did not spread to his other hand. He has a bruise on one hand and a separate bruise on another hand. There’s no spreading because that’s not how a bruise works. It’s not fucking contagious.

I don't want to think about any part of his body whatsoever, but he does generally wear a shirt and jacket so we don't see his arms or chest. It's possible that the bruise on his hand did literally spread to the other hand via his arms and torso.

[–] anon_8675309@lemmy.world 9 points 5 hours ago

They were being snarky.

[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 10 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (2 children)

You are using entirely the wrong sense of the word. It didn't spread like a rash, it spread like an idea. It spread like a bad smell. It spread like a poorly kept secret.

[–] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 5 points 5 hours ago

Like an extra airy fart in a hot, humid room.

[–] WindyRebel@lemmy.world -1 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (2 children)

For sure. I do understand how it was used, but it still sounds stupid. Just write, “Bruise appears on Trump’s other hand—speculations rise” or something to that effect.

Edit: I think in a world where people just read the headlines, and with many Americans reading at a low level, that people might take it more literally which I why I don’t like the headline as written.

[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 6 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

And to forestall your next objection, headlines ARE poetry. It's a form of constrained writing with hundreds of years of poetic conventions and devices.

[–] Bytemeister@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago

It's the kind of poetry a Vogon would produce after his second Pan Galactic Gargle Blaster.

Source : Took journalism in school and it fucked up my ACTs.

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 1 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

There's nothing poetic about the comma conjunction.

It’s a form of constrained writing with hundreds of years of poetic conventions and devices.

The same is true of natural language to a great extent. It's metaphor and idiom all the way down, with a bit of grammatical glue. Well, a lot of grammatical glue in some languages.

[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 2 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Imagine a world with no poetry. How horrid. Let stupid people be confused, they are perfectly used to it and have a faculty for it you cannot defeat.

[–] WindyRebel@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

I hear what you’re saying, but let poetry be in poems and let direct truth be in headlines. I don’t see a reason to pretty up news.

[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 2 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

Damn it, your predictable knee jerk response was almost faster than I could anticipate. That's how basic you're being right now.

You cannot fit "truth" in an entire broadsheet page, let alone a headline. That is why it is unavoidably poetic. I'm not making an analogy, headlines literally are poetry.

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)
[–] BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

If it were a brown migrant ICE would have disappeared it already.