this post was submitted on 30 Dec 2025
285 points (98.6% liked)

Atheism

5509 readers
550 users here now

Community Guide


Archive Today will help you look at paywalled content the way search engines see it.


Statement of Purpose

Acceptable

Unacceptable

Depending on severity, you might be warned before adverse action is taken.

Inadvisable


Application of warnings or bans will be subject to moderator discretion. Feel free to appeal. If changes to the guidelines are necessary, they will be adjusted.


If you vocally harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathizer or a resemblant of a group that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of any other group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you you will be banned on sight.

Provable means able to provide proof to the moderation, and, if necessary, to the community.

 ~ /c/nostupidquestions

If you want your space listed in this sidebar and it is especially relevant to the atheist or skeptic communities, PM DancingPickle and we'll have a look!


Connect with Atheists

Help and Support Links

Streaming Media

This is mostly YouTube at the moment. Podcasts and similar media - especially on federated platforms - may also feature here.

Orgs, Blogs, Zines

Mainstream

Bibliography

Start here...

...proceed here.

Proselytize Religion

From Reddit

As a community with an interest in providing the best resources to its members, the following wiki links are provided as historical reference until we can establish our own.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] logicbomb@lemmy.world 121 points 1 week ago (4 children)

I wanted more context than this article offered.

There is a lot of extra detail in the Wikipedia article.

The key background points were that this was for a psychology class and the essay's topic was a research paper about gender typicality in middle school students. Ranting about trans people is pretty far off-topic, but there's some wiggle room in the grading.

The key identity-related point is that the instructor is a trans gender grad student and originally gave her a zero. A cis gender person re-graded the essay and also gave it a failing grade, but apparently not a zero. The college is apparently only punishing the trans person, and is completely wiping out the grade for the essay, despite it being re-graded.

So, it seems this is not only about rewarding a student for writing mindless nonsense due to her Christianity. It's also strongly about punishing the teacher simply because she is a trans woman.

[–] ImgurRefugee114@reddthat.com 72 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Quoting the wiki, it's worth noting:

Fulnecky's mother is a lawyer who has previously provided legal defense for those who took part in the January 6 United States Capitol attack.

Canadian anti-trans activist Billboard Chris responded by saying that being transgender should result in a person being "automatically disqualified from holding any position as teacher or professor", to which Fulnecky's mother agreed, saying that she was proud of her daughter

For anyone who wants a more entertaining analysis, here's a good vid going over what the student wrote

https://youtu.be/xTxFSCKNAQU

It's pretty much written devoid of any relation to the class or subject matter; pretty much a giant 'let me sue you so I can grift for attention' button any honest teacher is obligated to press.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 42 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

to expound on that. we're talking about a junior in a psychology major. It's a science heavy major.

She should know how to:

  • cite sources
  • Discern good sources from bad.
  • understand that the bible is not a good source for psychology.
  • know how to right a fucking essay and answer the question that was being asked.

There were all of two sentences relating to the article which she was supposed to talk about. Those two sentences were basically "I disagree with this article".

Her only source- if you want to call it a source- was the bible. But she didn't even bother cite specific parts of the bible, just waxed inelegantly about "traditional" gender norms and insisting that bullying people because they weren't cisgendered is good. (which is what the article was about, IIRC, bullying of noncis kids in middleschool.)

(for people interested, Forest Valkai has a good break down on the essay, and why she failed

[–] TherapyGary@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

OU offers both a BA and a BS in psychology, so she might be on the less science-heavy track

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That’s an essay I would have been failed for in high school. A ba in psych is still going to be science heavy.

The teachers were right to fail her and it’s pretty clear that OU is punishing them anyways.

Because the student is a crisis actor who ran to Turing Point to pretend she was some how persecuted for her beliefs.

[–] TherapyGary@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Oh I absolutely agree she deserved a 0

I'm just not surprised to see students not knowing how to vet sources and understand research

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Like, one of the first classes they make you take is exactly how to do that. Though, I don't find it surprising either. I find it depressing.

[–] fizzle@quokk.au 30 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Grad Student has my sympathy, didnt do anything "wrong", and is certainly the victim in this.

That said for anyone wondering, a general best practice is to notify your supervisor whenever you encounter something that may become a complaint.

"Hey this kid is trying to rage bait me, what do?"

The student deserved a grade of 0, but sadly it seems the grad student walked into this trap and unwittingly became the foot stool from whence this vapid bimbo will launch her Kirk career.

[–] logicbomb@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago

The student deserved a grade of 0, but sadly it seems the grad student walked into this trap and unwittingly became the foot stool from whence this vapid bimbo will launch her Kirk career.

Let's not forget that her mother is a right wing nutjob lawyer who seems to have been heavily involved in this incident. So, there is a strong nepo baby element here, as well.

The student herself seems like an incompetent loser who wouldn't go anywhere on her own, so without her mommy's pressure, I doubt she could have anything like a Kirk career.

[–] a_non_monotonic_function@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

In an interview she bragged about how she only spent a few minutes to sloppily put it together so she could go see a musical on campus or something. She admits that it was easy and didn't require any effort in her part.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yeah and I've never had a college level essay that could get full marks when put out in 30 minutes. An hour, sure, but you need to think, write, edit, and cite. That's not "type it up snd send it out" speed

I don't often even assign things that take 30 minutes. If someone puts in that little effort they will probably get a zero from me.