this post was submitted on 30 Dec 2025
38 points (91.3% liked)
Asklemmy
52068 readers
477 users here now
A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions
If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!
- Open-ended question
- Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
- Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
- Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
- An actual topic of discussion
Looking for support?
Looking for a community?
- Lemmyverse: community search
- sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
- !lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities
~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~
founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Where does it say imperialist is a no-go?
"Equal and just" to me sounds like it shouldn't be imperialist.
"equal and just", "low-crime"
You can be equal and just within a country and imperialist outside of the country. I'd say there's a huge difference between inner and outer politics and policies.
The amount of crime also depends on what the country sees as a crime. Since Germany likes to not prosecute tax evaders if they do it with millions of Euros, and lots of Germans are victims of scams and fraud, I'd say crime there is bad in terms of monetary crime.
In contrast to that, physical harm is more rare than financial harm in German crime, so I'd say if you value not being financially sucked dry by the rich go somewhere else, but if you mostly value your physical safety and health and don't care if you're fleeced by the super rich Germany is pretty good.
but OP didn't specify that they only care about low-"interior"-crime, so what are you talking about then? "interior", physical crime might be your first thought when you read those words, but OP is very obviously concerned with the overall progressive & ethical situation of the country that they move to, so while the distinctions that you're drawing are real and could be relevant in some context, they definitely aren't in this thread.
They didn't specify anything, that's why I was trying to discuss and differentiate things. I can't read minds. It seems that you have a better grasp on the situation, so I'm sorry I provided another, objectively wrong, viewpoint.