this post was submitted on 29 Dec 2025
179 points (100.0% liked)

traingang

22952 readers
5 users here now

Post as many train pictures as possible.

All about urbanism and transportation, including freight transportation.

Home of train gang

:arm-L::train-shining::arm-R:

Talk about supply chain issues here!

List of cool books and videos about urbanism, transit, and other cool things

Titles must be informative. Please do not title your post "lmao" or use the tired "_____ challenge" format.

Archive links for reactionary sites, including the BBC.

LANDLORDS COWER IN FEAR OF MAOTRAIN

"that train pic is too powerful lmao" - u/Cadende

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] huf@hexbear.net 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

but a forest around the houses would make summers bearable and the yards/decks usable in good weather.

[–] MemesAreTheory@hexbear.net 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Not if it's 100 feet away or more, depending upon which "friend" you are, casting absolutely no shade on your hot ass deck and leading to massively increased AC bills because you get direct sunlight 13 hours a day.

[–] huf@hexbear.net 5 points 1 week ago (2 children)

yes, but my point was to plant a forest in the yard so it's all completely shaded. no direct sunlight below the treetops. ever.

[–] MemesAreTheory@hexbear.net 5 points 1 week ago

Honestly my bad I was trying to dunk on the suburb apologist and hit a comrade by not paying close enough attention to which thread I was replying to.

Care-Comrade I'm sorry

[–] The_hypnic_jerk@hexbear.net 1 points 1 week ago (2 children)

rain + wind gusts = tree on house

[–] huf@hexbear.net 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

i've lived in houses on tree-lined streets most of my life and while this does happen, it's pretty rare. meanwhile, they provide shade every day in the warmer months, and look nicer than grass even in the winter, when they're bare.

cutting down all the trees so none of them can ever fall on your house seems like a bad tradeoff.

[–] The_hypnic_jerk@hexbear.net 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I guess it depends on where you live, growing up where I did it was considered a pretty major hazard and would cause issues with insurance.

Not that there was no trees, but you did have to be conscious of where they could fall and it was frequent that larger ones would be removed if too close to a house.

Basically grew up on top of a swamp that gets hit by hurricanes though, so maybe not a ubiquitous experience

[–] huf@hexbear.net 2 points 1 week ago

we get a tree torn out (or at least significant parts of it torn off) every two years or so just in my neighborhood, when a summer storm gets funneled down into a narrow street. they sometimes crush cars, and i guess they sometimes fall into buildings. the individual chance is extremely low, and the neighborhood is immeasurably better for all the trees. you can walk to the store in the shade for the most part, it's amazing.

[–] RNAi@hexbear.net 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That's very unlikely. Unless you live in a hurricane/tornado area but you'd have worse problems than your own tree leaning on your roof

[–] The_hypnic_jerk@hexbear.net 2 points 1 week ago

I am thinking of hurricane areas yeah, it kills people