this post was submitted on 28 Dec 2025
89 points (100.0% liked)

chat

8548 readers
52 users here now

Chat is a text only community for casual conversation, please keep shitposting to the absolute minimum. This is intended to be a separate space from c/chapotraphouse or the daily megathread. Chat does this by being a long-form community where topics will remain from day to day unlike the megathread, and it is distinct from c/chapotraphouse in that we ask you to engage in this community in a genuine way. Please keep shitposting, bits, and irony to a minimum.

As with all communities posts need to abide by the code of conduct, additionally moderators will remove any posts or comments deemed to be inappropriate.

Thank you and happy chatting!

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Like a story can literally beat someone over the head with a theme or moral and people somehow come to the opposite conclusion?

It's like "Tyler Durden is so manly and cool" except every bit of media feels like it's misinterpreted like that now.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ScoffingLizard@lemmy.dbzer0.com -3 points 1 week ago (4 children)

I couldn't figure out how supporting an Israeli state is Zionist. They have been back in Israel since like 1948. At this point, given the generations that have been born there, and given that people should be able to live on the planet they were born on, a two state solution is preferable so that both Palestinians and Israelis have a home. An Israeli state and a two state solution are not mutually exclusive conditions, therefore Mamdami's support of an Israeli state is not Zionist necessarily, unless I just misunderstand the definition.

[–] LeninWeave@hexbear.net 36 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I couldn't figure out how supporting an Israeli state is Zionist.

The definition of "zionism" is supporting the existence of "Israel" in Palestine. A two-state "solution" is zionism. Jewish people can live in Palestine without having a state built on stolen land.

An Israeli state and a two state solution are not mutually exclusive conditions

Reality disagrees with this assertion. Unfortunately, looking at the current state of things and the history that led to it, we can see that they are.

[–] Trying2KnowMyself@hexbear.net 27 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] LeninWeave@hexbear.net 23 points 1 week ago (1 children)

this Which means that a two-state "solution" is actually incompatible with the existence of "Israel", meaning there is no such thing.

[–] Trying2KnowMyself@hexbear.net 24 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

It’s great that those episodes were recorded before history started on October 7th, too.

[–] ScoffingLizard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I haven't heard about this. I can only read the text though. The media is blocked for some reason.

[–] Trying2KnowMyself@hexbear.net 2 points 1 week ago

You can probably find those Citations Needed episodes on just about any place you can listen to podcasts, if that particular site doesn’t work. Here’s the first one on:

[–] purpleworm@hexbear.net 20 points 1 week ago

Zionism is anything that supports Israel as an ethnostate. You can support the idea that most Jews couldn't/shouldn't realistically be deported without supporting Israel continuing to exist as an ethnostate. That falls under the non-zionist "one state solution" umbrella (as opposed to the zionist one state solution, which is Israel's current actual project).

[–] SickSemper@hexbear.net 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If the Nazis won in 45, would you say that the children of German settlers in Czechia or the Soviet Union should be able to live on the land they were born on?

[–] ScoffingLizard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I get what you're saying, but babies can't help where they are born. It's unfathomable that a baby born doesn't have the right to exist anywhere.

[–] SickSemper@hexbear.net 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Sorry, you don’t get a stolen house just because you were born in it post-theft.

You’re clearly arguing for Nazi and Zionist settler colonialism, so long as the parents have a kid once they’ve massacred the original owners, if your universal principle is “babies (and by implication all children of settlers, even as adults/former babies) get to remain as an immovable force while the native population sucks it up”

[–] ScoffingLizard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

In my country, a child is born a citizen even if the parents are criminals and here with no visa. But no, for fuck sake would everyone stop calling me a Nazi. I can't stand Israel right now and everyone goes straight to virtue signaling and calling people Nazis. Its so frustrating.

[–] SickSemper@hexbear.net 1 points 1 week ago

Oh, are you not proposing exactly what I’m laying out? You don’t exactly have a concrete plan for decolonization and restitution. All you can do is whine about former children and not understand how settler colonialism is bad