this post was submitted on 25 Dec 2025
691 points (98.1% liked)

Technology

4942 readers
690 users here now

Which posts fit here?

Anything that is at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.


Post guidelines

[Opinion] prefixOpinion (op-ed) articles must use [Opinion] prefix before the title.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original linkPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

!globalnews@lemmy.zip
!interestingshare@lemmy.zip


Icon attribution | Banner attribution


If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @brikox@lemmy.zip.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 6 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

https://lithub.com/resist-authoritarianism-by-refusing-to-obey-in-advance/

bottom line: compliance to fascism before it's forced you to comply is how fascism goes from visible in the public sphere to all consuming slaughter machine. the best way to resist fascism is early and often. make them work for it. especially when the current iteration is fundamentally composed of lazy losers

[–] artyom@piefed.social -1 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

This is not even remotely the same thing. This article is talking about doing something that you are asked to do by fascists or anticipate being illegal. The situation we're discussing is literally already signed law and it's simply a matter of (a very specific) time before it's mandated.

[–] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 2 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

i wanted to take some time to review and reflect, and i cannot bring myself to the same conclusion. as you said, the mandate does not exist yet. plus, this fascist regime has invented new ways of losing in the courts because they simply don't have total control yet. bluesky has the resources to fight for their users right in court. by choosing not to wait for a court order or even put up a minimal legal resistance, they complied in advance. to me, their decision to remove these posts or ban these accounts reflects not a requirement to comply, but instead company values. they thought it would be easier and cheaper to roll over. i think this is ultimately the underlying flaw of for-profit media companies so i'm not surprised, and the conclusion i reach is that with a for profit media company, i am the product. as the product, i can refuse to have my attention sold to the highest bidder as an "impression." if i don't like fascism, i don't use bluesky. so i don't

[–] artyom@piefed.social -1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

the mandate does not exist yet

It does.

bluesky has the resources to fight for their users right in court.

They don't.

[–] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 0 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

then why restore the posts and accounts? why did you say the mandate would exist soon instead of already? and yes. the absolutely have the money to hire a lawyer and put forward the legal deposits to challenge this in court. any company with more than 50 employees not approaching bankruptcy filings does

[–] artyom@piefed.social 0 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

why did you say the mandate would exist soon instead of already?

You're mixing up various timelines. There is the date it was signed into law, and the date it was enforced, and these are both in the past. BSky enacted this between the 2.

the absolutely have the money to hire a lawyer and put forward the legal deposits to challenge this in court.

It would be a waste of money. There's no way a scrappy startup wins a lawsuit of that scale against a state government or especially even an international one.

[–] cassandrafatigue@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 24 minutes ago (1 children)

That delicious leather-rubber-mud taste.

[–] artyom@piefed.social 1 points 2 minutes ago

Ah yeah, everyone should all be cool outlaws like you, right?

[–] cassandrafatigue@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Its irrational radicals like you who are undermining the resistance effort

Just pick up a severe eating disorder, donate all your money to the heritage foundation, and play a round of Russian roulette every night. Spin that cylinder! For the resistance!

Fucking insane children trying yo undermine real, serious adult resistance. I swear if the fascists win it will be all your fault.

[–] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 3 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

took me longer than i would have liked to realize you were joking 😂

we live in a nightmare…

You know, considering your liberal allies ajoke rather than getting serious and supporting us and killing yourself in a blood sacrifice to the fuhrer is why you people can't possibly win