this post was submitted on 25 Dec 2025
58 points (98.3% liked)
technology
24342 readers
243 users here now
On the road to fully automated luxury gay space communism.
Spreading Linux propaganda since 2020
- Ways to run Microsoft/Adobe and more on Linux
- The Ultimate FOSS Guide For Android
- Great libre software on Windows
- Hey you, the lib still using Chrome. Read this post!
Rules:
- 1. Obviously abide by the sitewide code of conduct. Bigotry will be met with an immediate ban
- 2. This community is about technology. Offtopic is permitted as long as it is kept in the comment sections
- 3. Although this is not /c/libre, FOSS related posting is tolerated, and even welcome in the case of effort posts
- 4. We believe technology should be liberating. As such, avoid promoting proprietary and/or bourgeois technology
- 5. Explanatory posts to correct the potential mistakes a comrade made in a post of their own are allowed, as long as they remain respectful
- 6. No crypto (Bitcoin, NFT, etc.) speculation, unless it is purely informative and not too cringe
- 7. Absolutely no tech bro shit. If you have a good opinion of Silicon Valley billionaires please manifest yourself so we can ban you.
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Maybe I should make a new thread. But what is the communist line on rust?
In Linux I have seen there is controversy with some rust being introduced in a foundational way. Replacing C. some people say it's trash. Some people say its "safe" and then others dispute that.
In terms of little tools I do find the rust ones are nice to have on hand. Ag silver searcher is much faster than grep. But grep being more mature and feature complete I would never get rid of or replace it. That is probably a question of modernity vs hours spent on it. If both grep and ag started from scratch in 2025 idk how it'd work out.
Is rust like some sort of neoliberal intervention? That's kind if the vibe I get but I can't justify it or contemplate any adverse outcomes.
It's not safe. It just makes it easier to write safe code. Important difference. Just like when people claim you "can't have a memory leak in a garbage-collected language", they are also full of shit; all you have to do is keep a reference to something you never plan to use again, and you have as bad of a memory leak as in any environment where you can forget to call free/delete.
I'm also using "easier" here with mild sarcasm. Sometimes it's difficult to get the constructs right in Rust so that shit will compile. Once you do, it's less likely you'll do stuff like leak memory than if you get a program in another language to compile. So "easier" is really more like shorthand for "somewhat harder, most of the time, to let your brain worms escape to the runtime stage" (i.e. production).