this post was submitted on 25 Dec 2025
584 points (96.2% liked)

Microblog Memes

9955 readers
1502 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Turret3857@infosec.pub 6 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

You really shouldnt need all of these extensions, and the more extensions you use the more fingerprint able you are. May I suggest stock LibreWolf/IronFoxn or Mullvad Browser instead?

[–] rekabis@lemmy.ca 1 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

the more fingerprint able you are

Missed Privacy Tweaks, did ya? Look closer.

[–] wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

It lists these tweaks, none of which I understand to have anything to do with extension detection/fingerprinting:

[–] rekabis@lemmy.ca 1 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

extension detection/fingerprinting

So you’re talking about bot detection and bot denial of a website, then.

Well, I’m not a bot.

[–] wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

No, I'm talking about extension detection being used as part of the process to fingerprint your browser to identitify you as a unique person.

That's used to track you across websites for ad targeting and other shit such as but not limited to sites displaying different prices to different people based off information they've gathered on you and connected to your unique fingerprint.

Fingerprinting effects a lot more than the ads you don't see due to blocking them and bot detection. Please read up on it more instead of running with assumptions.

[–] Turret3857@infosec.pub 2 points 18 hours ago (2 children)
[–] wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 18 hours ago

Notable section from the Wikipedia article linked there as "stand out":

I'm not well versed on it, but I believe installed extensions are directly query-able through javascript or html5 on sites loaded by the browser.

[–] rekabis@lemmy.ca 1 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Preaching to the choir.

The list above is the vast majority of my add-ins. I don’t use any which are sufficiently duplicated in the browser or which are not required for enhanced security.

I am not one of those people with multiple dozens of add-ins.

[–] Turret3857@infosec.pub 1 points 12 hours ago

You say you aren't one of those people but i genuinely dont believe most of those extensions are needed if youre using hardened Firefox (LibreWolf/IronFox/Mullvad Browser/Tor)