this post was submitted on 24 Dec 2025
9 points (71.4% liked)

Unpopular Opinion

8318 readers
35 users here now

Welcome to the Unpopular Opinion community!


How voting works:

Vote the opposite of the norm.


If you agree that the opinion is unpopular give it an arrow up. If it's something that's widely accepted, give it an arrow down.



Guidelines:

Tag your post, if possible (not required)


  • If your post is a "General" unpopular opinion, start the subject with [GENERAL].
  • If it is a Lemmy-specific unpopular opinion, start it with [LEMMY].


Rules:

1. NO POLITICS


Politics is everywhere. Let's make this about [general] and [lemmy] - specific topics, and keep politics out of it.


2. Be civil.


Disagreements happen, but that doesn’t provide the right to personally attack others. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Please also refrain from gatekeeping others' opinions.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Shitposts and memes are allowed but...


Only until they prove to be a problem. They can and will be removed at moderator discretion.


5. No trolling.


This shouldn't need an explanation. If your post or comment is made just to get a rise with no real value, it will be removed. You do this too often, you will get a vacation to touch grass, away from this community for 1 or more days. Repeat offenses will result in a perma-ban.


6. Defend your opinion


This is a bit of a mix of rules 4 and 5 to help foster higher quality posts. You are expected to defend your unpopular opinion in the post body. We don't expect a whole manifesto (please, no manifestos), but you should at least provide some details as to why you hold the position you do.



Instance-wide rules always apply. https://legal.lemmy.world/tos/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] m0darn@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 hour ago (2 children)

To call a system of rigourous and methodical data collection, analyzed with systematic criticism that incentivizes dissent just a "different backstory" is kinda out of touch.

Compare it to other systems of authority. Legal authority derives from state violence, religious authority derives from faith, political authority derives from charisma.

[–] presoak@lazysoci.al 1 points 43 minutes ago

Out of touch? Oh no. And here I thought we merely disagreed or something.

True but there is a lot of clickey shit and certainly paid interests in academia. But if you understand the background of the article/study and can read competently, you can sniff it out... the problem is that most people are specialists at best, not all-rounder erudites. Basically, still take things with a grain of salt, don't just put blind faith in the words of men (specially while claiming one is not!).