this post was submitted on 13 Dec 2025
236 points (97.2% liked)

News

36912 readers
2440 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

California governor says order pushes ‘grift and corruption’ instead of innovation just hours after president’s dictum

The ink was barely dry on Donald Trump's artificial intelligence executive order when Gavin Newsom came out swinging. Just hours after the order went public Thursday evening, the California governor issued a statement saying the presidential dictum, which seeks to block states from regulating AI of their own accord, advances "grift and corruption" instead of innovation.

"President Trump and David Sacks aren't making policy -- they're running a con," Newsom said, referencing Trump's AI adviser and crypto "czar". "Every day, they push the limits to see how far they can take it."

Trump's executive order is a major victory for tech companies that have campaigned against legislative barriers to developing and deploying their AI products. It also sets up a clash between state governments and the White House over the future of AI regulation. The immediate backlash from groups including child safety organizations, unions and state officials has highlighted the deeply contentious nature of the order and diverse range of interests it affects.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ninexe@sh.itjust.works 11 points 3 months ago (3 children)

We need to stop plastering this guy's name over everything.

He's trying to stay as relevant as possible so that useful idiots vote for him over AOC in 2028.

Do not fall prey.

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 10 points 3 months ago (1 children)

There should be posters everywhere reading "KICK A HOBO FOR NEWSOM!"

He's a Feinstein protege and a nasty pro-corporate turd.

As a certified Newsom hater, I approve this message

[–] Mobiuthuselah@mander.xyz 6 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (3 children)

This is exactly what I've been thinking. He wants to keep his name in the news. He's not who we need, but I appreciate that he has teeth.

Back during Sanders' campaign, there was so much momentum, but he was blackballed from coverage. All of sudden, media was telling everybody that Biden was the top candidate. Tf!? Nobody was talking about Biden being a serious candidate until it looked like there was no choice. He was a fucking joke as a VP.

Newsom is starting early, and yeah sure, he's leagues better than what we have now (as president,) but come on, he's still a shit candidate. Almost anyone is going to look appealing compared to our current president. Let's not go for the loudest son of a bitch just because he's loud. Let's not box ourselves in this early by the "we need to rally around the strongest option" argument. We've got another three years of eating this shit sandwich. There are so many better options than Newsom. Buttigieg, maybe AOC, let's see how this shakes out. But come on, Newsom? Really?

Asking in good faith, will a Newsom supporter explain why he might be the best option over others? I'll honestly keep an open mind and ask questions to learn.

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

he’s leagues better than what we have now

In the same way that the clap is leagues better than ass cancer.

[–] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 1 points 3 months ago

Technically the truth!

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

they are afraid of another NYC situation in the presidential elections. more than likely they will try to work with the gop to sabotage another more left than gavin" candidate if they cant do it themselves.

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago

Good luck finding an actual Newsome supporter. I live in CA, and voted Newsome. The thing is, I only voted Newsome in the General. I don't remember who I voted for in the primary, doesn't matter. They didn't win.

As far as I can tell, from talking with people, that's how Newsome got all his votes. I'm sure someone out there actually likes him, but I've yet to meet them.

Same could be said for lying Todd Gloria, who ran on housing first policies, and just rounded up and jailed all the homeless people in San Diego

[–] AlecSadler@lemmy.blahaj.zone -2 points 3 months ago (2 children)

It's America, we're not going to elect a female president because a third of the country is sexist and another third doesn't realize they're sexist.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago

This talking point is used exclusively by people who are happy to hold all women back if it means preventing one particular woman from running.