Unpopular Opinion

8318 readers

14 users here now

Welcome to the Unpopular Opinion community!

How voting works:

Vote the opposite of the norm.

If you agree that the opinion is unpopular give it an arrow up. If it's something that's widely accepted, give it an arrow down.

Guidelines:

Tag your post, if possible (not required)

If your post is a "General" unpopular opinion, start the subject with [GENERAL].
If it is a Lemmy-specific unpopular opinion, start it with [LEMMY].

Rules:

1. NO POLITICS

Politics is everywhere. Let's make this about [general] and [lemmy] - specific topics, and keep politics out of it.

2. Be civil.

Disagreements happen, but that doesn’t provide the right to personally attack others. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Please also refrain from gatekeeping others' opinions.

3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.

4. Shitposts and memes are allowed but...

Only until they prove to be a problem. They can and will be removed at moderator discretion.

5. No trolling.

This shouldn't need an explanation. If your post or comment is made just to get a rise with no real value, it will be removed. You do this too often, you will get a vacation to touch grass, away from this community for 1 or more days. Repeat offenses will result in a perma-ban.

6. Defend your opinion

This is a bit of a mix of rules 4 and 5 to help foster higher quality posts. You are expected to defend your unpopular opinion in the post body. We don't expect a whole manifesto (please, no manifestos), but you should at least provide some details as to why you hold the position you do.

Instance-wide rules always apply. https://legal.lemmy.world/tos/

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

JonsJava@lemmy.world

lemann@lemmy.world

ptz@dubvee.org

technopagan@lemmy.world

Dremor@lemmy.world

There is no AI bubble (lemmy.ml)

submitted 1 week ago by wuphysics87@lemmy.ml to c/unpopularopinion@lemmy.world

18 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Not something I believe full stop, but imo there are signs that should there be a bubble, it will pop later than we may think. A few things for consideration.

Big tech continues to invest. They are greedy. They aren't stupid. They have access to better economic forcasting than we do. I believe they are aware of markets for the /application/ of AI which will continue to be profitable in the future. Think of how many things are pOwErEd By ArTiFiCiAl InTelIGence. That's really speak for we have api tokens we pay for.

Along these lines comes the stupid. Many of us have bosses who insist, if not demand, we use AI. The US Secretary of Defense had his own obnoxious version if this earlier this week. If the stupid want it, the demand will remain if not increase.

Artificial intellegence is self replicating, meaning if we feed it with whatever stupid queries we make, it will "get better" at the specifics and "create more versions". This creates further reliance and demand on those products that "do exactly what we want". It's an opiate. Like that one tng episode with the headsets (weak allusion and shameless pandering I know)

IMO generative AI is a dead end which will only exacerbate existing inequity. That doesn't mean there won't continue to be tremendous buy in which will warp our collective culture maintaining it's profitability. If the bubble bursts, I don't think it will be for a while.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] A_Union_of_Kobolds@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

There is only one thing for certain: the people who hold the purses dictate the policies.

I sympathize for the IT workers who feel like they're engineering their replacements. Eventually, only a fraction of those jobs will survive.

I believe hardware and market limitations will curb AI growth in the near future, hopefully the dust will start to settle and the real people who need to feed their families will find a way through. I think one way or another, there will be a serious need for social safety net programs to offset the IT labor surplus, which, hopefully, could create a (Socialist) Red Wave.

[–] nymnympseudonym@piefed.social 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

the people who hold the purses dictate the policies

Partly true. They are engaged in a dance with the technologists and researchers as we collectively figure out how exactly this is all going to work

IT workers who feel like they’re engineering their replacements

I know some who feel that way. But anecdotally most I know feel like we're racing in front of technology and history more than against plutocracy