this post was submitted on 12 Dec 2025
47 points (100.0% liked)
Games
21218 readers
290 users here now
Tabletop, DnD, board games, and minecraft. Also Animal Crossing.
Rules
- No racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, or transphobia. Don't care if it's ironic don't post comments or content like that here.
- Mark spoilers
- No bad mouthing sonic games here :no-copyright:
- No gamers allowed :soviet-huff:
- No squabbling or petty arguments here. Remember to disengage and respect others choice to do so when an argument gets too much
- Anti-Edelgard von Hresvelg trolling will result in an immediate ban from c/games and submitted to the site administrators for review. :silly-liberator:
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Yeah, I think that's the only time they've ever really tried to mess with the "formula" like that. I think there's a lot of ways they could have interesting turn based strategy and real time tactics, instead of just sticking to 20v20 fights in every game.
Indeed, I guess to be fair to the devs as a player, usually when I have big battles featuring 20+ units, one of those armies typically ends up camped somewhere while I micro their cavalry or something, either waiting for the first army to win or die. 20 units is just about as many as I need to be able to defeat like 90% of AI generated armies, let alone be able to really effectively use so many units, although thats kind of a skill issue on my part.