this post was submitted on 07 Dec 2025
492 points (93.6% liked)

Privacy

3899 readers
158 users here now

Icon base by Lorc under CC BY 3.0 with modifications to add a gradient

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A New York subway rider has accused a woman of breaking his Meta smart glasses. She was later hailed as a hero.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] village604@adultswim.fan 25 points 2 months ago (45 children)

I'm sure it's an unpopular opinion, but what she did is really shitty and she should be charged with it. She could have at least asked him to stop before destroying property.

It's really no different than if she smashed someone's phone because they were recording video in public.

[–] CentipedeFarrier@piefed.social 107 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

She could have at least asked him to stop before destroying property.

We don’t actually know that she didn’t, unless you’ve got another article with more detail. This article is sparse in details, but it’s only his word in it that she didn’t talk to him. That nobody was bothered by it. That it went from 0-100 in the span of a look.

And idk about you, but that doesn’t sound all that likely to me, when everyone laughs at him for the consequences (seen in video). The whole thing screams this guy is an unreliable narrator. The whole thing to me reads like he knew he was pissing people off, like a YouTube prank channel sort of bother, and expected to walk away from it consequence free.

This article has a bit more detail and it does make him sound like a shitty prank channel sort that relies on annoying other people going about their lives. But again has no info about the encounter except his own words.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/imagine-being-based-guy-says-143000399.html

[–] protist@mander.xyz 31 points 2 months ago

This is a very unpopular opinion in my opinion

[–] AngryishHumanoid@lemmynsfw.com 14 points 2 months ago (3 children)

I hate everything about the dude in the video but breaking his property is a shitty response.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 8 points 2 months ago

The problem with US society is a lack of shaming and negative enforcement.

[–] cassandrafatigue@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Yeah. Should've broken his face too.

[–] Mika@piefed.ca 11 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Unpopular unpopular opinion: recording public places for yourself shouldn't even be considered a bad tone. Distribution of those recordings should, unless they contain some illegal activity.

[–] cassandrafatigue@lemmy.dbzer0.com 21 points 2 months ago

These go through Facebook's servers. This is not a private recording.

[–] Cruxifux@feddit.nl 10 points 2 months ago (12 children)

Counter point: if you start filming me in public without my permission your phone is getting smashed, and I don’t care how shitty anybody thinks it is.

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 18 points 2 months ago

I'm glad the law disagrees with you. Someone doing something you consider disrespectful doesn't justify assault and property damage.

It sounds like you have some anger control issues going on if that's your go-to response.

[–] lowspeedchase@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 2 months ago (12 children)

When you wake up and walk outside to the corner store, you've had like 40 devices filming you.... lol

[–] Cruxifux@feddit.nl 13 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Yeah but there’s a difference between a security cam and someone filming me to mock me on the internet. And for the record I’m not stoked about everything else filming me either.

[–] lowspeedchase@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

https://www.foia.gov/ - Entire youtube channels with millions of followers request city camera, body cams, court cams, traffic cams.... everything... and mock you on the internet. I don't disagree with your feelings just reminding you of the world we live in.

[–] Cruxifux@feddit.nl 9 points 2 months ago

If I could get away with it I would destroy those too.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] 0_o7@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Those devices don't get in your face, aren't easily manuevered to film like a creep. Also the same device don't follow you around like a stalker.

Are those differences really that hard to see?

[–] Cruxifux@feddit.nl 3 points 2 months ago

I think the internet has ruined many people’s perceptions of what is socially acceptable and that there may be consequences for harassing others.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] bitcrafter@programming.dev 2 points 2 months ago

That's why in video games I smash everything in order to be safe.

load more comments (8 replies)

... Are you a cop or something?

[–] RustyShackleford@programming.dev 3 points 2 months ago (4 children)

If you're in a public space, people may be filming you.

It's a PUBLIC space, not yours. Your lack of self-control will rightly get you fucked up if you assault the wrong person, and there'll be a good chance of everyone watching a satisfying video of you getting punched while trying to take someone's phone.

TLDR: Control yourself, tough guy.

[–] Allero@lemmy.today 6 points 2 months ago (8 children)

Here's different optics to consider: we know for many camera-enabled devices to deliver recordings to the cloud, where the data is used by authorities, often times in a very improper way.

In US, it is coordinating ICE raids; in other countries, it's other kinds of shady and inhumane acts.

Fighting this on the level of legislation is great...when it works. Overturning the power of a dictator authority or simply struggling against decisions that are made up above often takes illegal, brutal acts, or at least ones of misdemeanor.

It sure never hurts to ask someone to stop first, but then I can see an angle when refusal is going to escalate things badly for reasons that could be understood.

[–] Cruxifux@feddit.nl 3 points 2 months ago

I think the assumption people are making here with my original comment is that I wouldn’t first tell them to stop and delete whatever they had recorded. Which is my fault because I can see that from the way I said it. But if that doesn’t work? Well, they don’t just get to keep doing it.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 months ago

So, creepy men are now allowed to stare and record videos of women because technology allows it?

[–] Cruxifux@feddit.nl 2 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Something being in a public space does not give everyone there free reign to do things that are rude. And given the upvotes/downvotes it seems like most people tend to agree with me here.

[–] bitcrafter@programming.dev 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I was not going to downvote your comment despite disagreeing with it, but since you are now citing your downvote/upvote ratio as proof that most people support your position, you now get downvotes from me.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] RustyShackleford@programming.dev 7 points 2 months ago (14 children)

Fuck internet points.

When in public, you can be recorded. Your permission isn't required. Public spaces belong to all. People have the right to film, take photos, and record audio. If you don't want that, campaign for legislation to change it. "Rudeness" isn't a legal term. If you can't tolerate being recorded in a public space, even "rudely", leave. Go somewhere else. If you assault someone recording you in public, you will potentially get the shit kicked out of you by that person, bystanders, and/or cops.

The state, in a legalistic framework, has a near-monopoly on justified escalation to physical violence. The person recording you has to be assaulting you first or disturbing the peace to a degree that it endangers you or other people's safety in order for your violence to be justified as defense.

You can't start a fight legally, but you can finish one. "Rudeness" isn't a good enough reason to start swinging.

So again, control yourself.

load more comments (14 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com 4 points 2 months ago

She could have at least asked him to stop before destroying property.

Stop what? Wouldn't there be a video of her breaking them if they were recording?

[–] lambalicious@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 2 months ago (3 children)

It was self defense, and defense of others around her. In my book, that's just about as much if not more than the police does these days.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (38 replies)