this post was submitted on 05 Dec 2025
205 points (95.6% liked)

Technology

40867 readers
246 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Well, that's just really shitty.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] djsaskdja@reddthat.com 1 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Could just use GIMP at that point.

[–] Powderhorn@beehaw.org 2 points 13 hours ago

I'm an old guy (started with Photoshop 5 -- not CS5; 5), and GIMP has never felt like software trying to help me accomplish a goal. It's the vi of image editors.

[–] CybranM@feddit.nu 1 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Gimp is not intuitive at all. Krita or Paint.net are good free alternatives and Affinity photo is great (but not free)

[–] dethedrus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Affinity is free as of a couple weeks ago. And there's talk of a Linux native version being considered iirc.

Requires a free license, so the old adage about you being the product probably applies.

[–] CybranM@feddit.nu 1 points 11 hours ago

Oh is it? TIL

Now if only they could make a Lightroom alternative Id be really happy

[–] t3rmit3@beehaw.org 5 points 1 day ago

I've tried. SO many times. It's just so damn clunky. I ended up using Krita (also FOSS) instead.