this post was submitted on 05 Dec 2025
145 points (98.0% liked)

movies

2190 readers
870 users here now

A community about movies and cinema.

Related communities:

Rules

  1. Be civil
  2. No discrimination or prejudice of any kind
  3. Do not spam
  4. Stay on topic
  5. These rules will evolve as this community grows

No posts or comments will be removed without an explanation from mods.

founded 9 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] IWW4@lemmy.zip 16 points 18 hours ago (2 children)
[–] SantasMagicalComfort@piefed.world 3 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

It typically costs more money to finance something.

[–] UnspecificGravity@piefed.social 9 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

Only for normal people. If you are rich or a company like this you can leverage assets for a rate lower than the rate of return on your investments and come out ahead by financing over paying cash. Rich people don't pay cash for anything.

[–] yakko@feddit.uk 5 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Shareholders foot the bill, ultimately.

[–] SantasMagicalComfort@piefed.world 4 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

Not the subscribers but the shareholders?

I'll never understand economics.

[–] pankuleczkapl@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Well, in fact it's not that complicated - shareholders literally own the company - and this ownership results in both the right to decide what happens to the company and receiving dividends, which are supposed to come from the company's surplus funds. In reality it's not that straightforward, but that's the general idea. So if a company spends money, you can think of it as spending shareholders' money allocated in the company's assets.

Well, in fact it's not that complicated

In reality it's not that straightforward

Well now I’m really fucking confused.

[–] yakko@feddit.uk 2 points 13 hours ago

Probably both to varying degrees. Neither will I.