1472
submitted 1 year ago by Merlin13245@lemmy.world to c/memes@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] lvxferre@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago

Dunno about other people, but in my case:

  • I don't consider killing a dog for eating as intrinsically abusive.
  • I never ate dogs, but I'd probably try it as long as raised and butchered as livestock. On the other hand I'd never touch someone's pet potbelly pig.
  • I'm drinking and you made me crave salami.
[-] Nika03@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

One could make the same points about any animal, really.

[-] lvxferre@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Like, the possibility of eating cats, or keeping a pet cow? Yes, and it would be consistent with the above.

[-] DarthFrodo@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Humans are animals as well. Just keep them as lifestock (e.g. on a cotton field or labor camp as we have done in the past), and killing them should be completely fine according to your logic. Who cares about the victims if we just declare them lifestock. Great ethics!

[-] lvxferre@lemmy.ml -2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Humans are animals as well.

No shit Sherlock.

Just keep them like lifestock (e.g. on a cotton field or labour camp as we have done in the past), and killing them should be completely fine according to your logic.

Following the reasoning that I've posted in another comment, another species keeping us as livestock wouldn't be doing something immoral in my book; they're defending their own interests, in detriment to ours. I don't expect for example a jaguar to put my self-preservation above its cub's desire for food.

And similarly it wouldn't be immoral if we fought against it.

Contrariwise to vegans I'm not putting humans on some holier-than-thou ground with intrinsically better moral grounds than the other species; it boils down to defence of one's own interests. Take a clue from the fact that my avatar is a smoking chimp dammit.

Who cares about the victims if we just declare them lifestock. Great ethics!

Appeal to emotion and other forms of stupidity/fallacy/irrationality don't work well against me. Try something else.

Although I'm suspecting that you guys' approach is something else: ad nauseam / sealeoning, is it?

[-] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

Wouldn't make much sense to raise dogs as livestock though, not enough meat on them and they pretty much need a diet that includes meat so it gets very expensive, especially for a dog that gets big enough to make a real steak from it...

[-] lvxferre@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 year ago

My point was mostly to highlight that pet vs. livestock for me depends on raising conditions, not on species.

That said you're correct that raising dogs as a main source of meat wouldn't be efficient or practical, unlike pig, horse, cow, rabbit, guinea pigs etc.

[-] Zacryon@feddit.de 3 points 1 year ago

That doesn't need to stop us. We got pretty good with breeding animals for specific traits. So you could take dogs which are very massive and breed them until they yield even more meat. Just like we did and do with cows and pigs. Also it is possible to feed dogs on a plant based diet, so it wouldn't be that much more expensive. (Besides, meat is extremely cheap due to subsidies. It costs much more to have a plant based diet, especially if it's organically grown. You could also use meat scraps as it is also done for pet food. Further lowering the price.)

this post was submitted on 16 Sep 2023
1472 points (92.1% liked)

Memes

45657 readers
700 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS