this post was submitted on 28 Nov 2025
393 points (98.3% liked)

Technology

78785 readers
4230 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@hackingne.ws
393
The Supreme Court Is About to Hear a Case That Could Rewrite Internet Access (slate.com)
submitted 1 month ago by RegularJoe@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world
57 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

"Imagine losing internet access because someone in your household downloaded pirated music."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Prox@lemmy.world 110 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I'm gonna go to businesses I don't like, hop on the Wi-Fi, and pirate from all the most obvious trackers.

[–] ChaosSpectre@lemmy.zip 51 points 1 month ago (2 children)

This seems like the best strategy realistically. If scotus makes it everyones problem, then make it a problem for those with the most to lose from losing internet access.

Starbucks in particular would have a bad time lol

[–] douglasg14b@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

They wouldn't though, large businesses see no consequences from laws that you and I would see consequences for.

[–] Zoot@reddthat.com 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Then you get your pirated content with no worry, for once I seethis as a win win!

[–] douglasg14b@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Naw, they will figure out how to target you specifically.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Nah, then it just becomes a defacto situation of the content creation companies (Disney, Sony, etc) owning the telecom companies. So you will truly be a single content household, like a Disney Household or a Paramount Household.

[–] Jarix@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

... And Sean Kennedy's listener licence becomes just a little closer to reality.

(I know that no one knows who that is, but Tales From the Afternoon was ironically prophetic and well ahead of it's time. Unfortunately I'm one of a very few people who knows who he is lol)

[–] CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works 32 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Great sentiment but we all know a business will get a pass for this just like when Meta got busted torrenting all those books and were told its okay because they're using it to train their AI.

[–] KelvarCherry@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 month ago

only one way to find out!

[–] Kissaki@feddit.org 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Is that the conclusion? I thought that's still under investigation. I remember reading about it months after the first reports.

[–] gwl@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 month ago

It intentionally got buried in legal, it's likely going to take 10 years and end up as a settlement out of court

[–] willington@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 month ago

Selective enforcement.