this post was submitted on 24 Nov 2025
42 points (92.0% liked)
Slop.
740 readers
724 users here now
For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.
Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.
Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.
Rule 3: No sectarianism.
Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome
Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.
Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.
Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
link but this isn't really picked up anywhere else. Predictably, the same disgusting people (referring to H3, Destiny, etc) who spread the dubious "Hasan shocked his dog" stuff don't care about this one, so it isn't all over the internet.
so after the Panda zoo and this, I'm out for good.
s here should recognize that gacha slop like Uma Musume also funds horse racing (the franchise is basically PR for the Japan Racing Association) and is only a small separation from betting at the track. It was obnoxious seeing the wave of people talking about it at launch and seeing it plastered all over gaming sites, Steam, etc. Most people probably don't think twice about it because horse girls in anime just 'makes sense' in a vacuum, but I want to bring more attention to the cruel industry by using that franchise and Hasan as a springboard.
my reply was just making fun of your pedantic 'do you have the same criticism of china for hosting the horse racing' comment because, like they said themselves in their own response to this, why wouldn't the OP (or anyone opposed to horse racing to the point where they think people shouldn't attend the races even as a novelty) have that same criticism??????
I never said it was absurd to criticize China, HK, or any other country or people who live there who may also participate in the same activity or behavior being criticized. I don't watch Hasan nor do I care about what he does. Your reply in general is trying to ascribe a lot of assumptions but instead of arguing i'll leave you with this:
WARNING!!
ARE YOU THINKING ABOUT CRITICIZING A STREAMER??
HAVE YOU CONSIDERED THAT IT IS WEIRD, TO SOME, TO MICRO-ANALYZE THE ACTIONS OF A GIVEN PERSON? HAVE YOU CONSIDERED CRITICIZING THE INSTITUTIONS OR OTHER PEOPLE PARTICIPATING IN THE SAME SITUATION INSTEAD OF THE STREAMER????
It was an honest question. Notice how I didn't argue with their response to my question because I wanted to know what they think and not because it was a trick.
People should think about this. Substitute a different person into the situation. ex "I went to my barber over the weekend and my barber told me that they went to a Zoo. I'm making this post to make other people aware of my barber visiting a Zoo. I like my haircut but I can't have my hair cut by someone who would visit a Zoo. If you get your hair cut by the same barber, consider changing your barber."
He's a hugely popular political journalist with a large platform who claims, to that audience, to subscribe to the same ideology that I do while simultaneously and consistently misrepresenting that ideology, often in egregious and even offensive ways. Criticising him is not the same as criticising a fucking barber.