Technology

40770 readers

328 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

alyaza@beehaw.org

TheRtRevKaiser@beehaw.org

gyrfalcon@beehaw.org

rs5th@beehaw.org

coldredlight@beehaw.org

SemioticStandard@beehaw.org

TheRtRevKaiser@kbin.social

remington@beehaw.org

136

Americans are holding onto devices longer than ever and it's costing the economy (cnbc.com)

submitted 4 days ago by alyaza@beehaw.org to c/technology@beehaw.org

123 comments fedilink hide all child comments

The average American now holds onto their smartphone for 29 months, according to a recent survey by Reviews.org, and that cycle is getting longer. The average was around 22 months in 2016.

While squeezing as much life out of your device as possible may save money in the short run, especially amid widespread fears about the strength of the consumer and job market, it might cost the economy in the long run, especially when device hoarding occurs at the level of corporations.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] dylanmorgan@slrpnk.net 13 points 3 days ago (4 children)

It genuinely floors me that few medium and large-sized companies don’t use Linux for desktops. You can customize gnome or KDE to work very similarly to windows from a UI/UX perspective, especially with the number of web based apps companies rely on. Windows and Office might start sucking less if they had real competition.

[–] gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 2 days ago

It genuinely floors me that few medium and large-sized companies don’t use Linux for desktops.

our university does. at least on most computers.

[–] sanzky@beehaw.org 8 points 3 days ago

MDM and support costs.

[–] 4am@lemmy.zip 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

There is a lot of specialized shit that Excel does that calc isn’t up to par on.

You also can’t easily cripple calc with group policy (no pesky macros or external connections, you little babies! Copy and paste or get dead)

[–] SteevyT@beehaw.org 1 points 3 days ago

Wait, you cant create macros in calc? I haven't had a reason to try yet, but what?

[–] ByteSorcerer@beehaw.org 5 points 3 days ago

The main reason is tech debt and proprietary software. Most companies have decades of software infrastructure all built on Microsoft based systems. Transitioning all that stuff to Linux is a massive investment, especially taking into account the downtime it'll cause combined with the temporary decrease in productivity when everyone has to get trained and build up experience with the new platform.

And then you have to deal with proprietary software. A lot of niche corporate or industrial hardware only supports Windows. And you probably have to regularly interact with customers who use Windows and share files with you that can only be opened in Windows only proprietary software.

Linux also frequently struggles with a lot of weird driver issues and other weird quirks, causing an increased burden on the IT department.

Basically you're looking at a massive investment in the short term, for significantly reduced productivity in the long run. And all that mostly to save a bit of hardware costs, which are only a fraction of the operating costs for most companies. Just sticking with Windows ends up being the more economical choice for most companies.