this post was submitted on 21 Nov 2025
521 points (93.5% liked)

Political Memes

9873 readers
2683 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] PugJesus@piefed.social 27 points 6 days ago (4 children)

Being against the rabid Zionism of the Dem mainstream is based. The second point, not so much.

warn people that losing an election to fascists will lead to fascism

people ignore the warning

election is lost to fascists

fascist administration immediately starts doing fascist things

blame the LIBS for making a big deal out of it

???

[–] bdonvr@thelemmy.club 33 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I think their point is that they pull the same tactic every year and it's clear it's shit

[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

my gripe with them about that, is that they refuse to do any systemic change to avoid fascism, because they have three same corporate donors that republicans have. their job isn't too protect the people, is to preserve the status quo that leads to erosion of rights.

They had plenty of time to codify abortion rights, instead they sat on it to use as a carrot for the next election.

that's why every election is the most important, because they refuse to fix the system

[–] PugJesus@piefed.social 1 points 5 days ago

On one hand, I would point out that many 'easy' fixes are not actually that easy when you consider the fucked state of our government and that the Dems are inherently a 'big-tent' party.

On the other hand, you're completely correct that the Dem mainstream refuses (without being pressed) to consider anything that shakes the precious status quo because it would upset their donors, and they refuse to consider that the system might be broken and in need of fixing (though that latter point, admittedly, they share with our blinkered fucking electorate).

I would point out more broadly that though money is a MASSIVE influence in US politics, ultimately, votes are the motivator for most Dem politicians. Politicians are generally in the position because they like power, and they cling to power by re-election. If the narrative of the electorate changes, and voting patterns with it, especially primary voting patterns, Dem politicians will fall over themselves to change their stated positions. If by the next primary cycle, the Dem electorate had shifted to be a bunch of far-left radicals who demanded repeated-if-futile attempts to reform the system even with a minority in the legislature, and massacred incumbents accordingly, even ghouls like Pelosi would suddenly become champions of 'the people'.

The mistake many people on here make is thinking that politicians in a bourgeois democracy are loyal to capital in some nebulous way, and aiming for wealth. By and large, they are not (though there are certainly exceptions, both ideological and personal). By and large, they are loyal to themselves, and aiming for power. Capital and wealth are only means to that end. As long as the support of capital buys them votes, and wealth buys them influence, they will pursue both - when capital stops guaranteeing a re-election from an electorate with the approximate memory of goldfish, mainstream politicians will change their allegiances accordingly.

HOW the fuck we get there, I have no fucking clue. But it is good to remain clear-sighted on the nature of the enemy.

[–] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world -5 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Tankies not organizing and voting to then wonder why they have no influence is like not training for a marathon and wondering why you aren't making it very far.

[–] PugJesus@piefed.social -2 points 6 days ago

Not just tankies, unfortunately.

[–] null@piefed.nullspace.lol 0 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

Makes perfect sense when you realize their goal is to accelerate the complete collapse of the system so that their perfect ideology can rise from the ashes.

The snark from the sidelines is just gravy on top.

[–] PugJesus@piefed.social 18 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (2 children)

I don't think everyone who talks like that is an accelerationist. Many are just deeply disillusioned, and fuck, I can hardly blame them for being disillusioned.

I just think that particular volley is misaimed. The Dems have plenty of problems - emphasizing the importance of elections - especially considering the conse-fucking-quences of losing the last one we're seeing right now - is not one of them.

[–] null@piefed.nullspace.lol 15 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Probably true, I think the "vote blue no matter who" line needs to really die. The messaging needs to be that the vote is against fascism, not in support of the status quo.

[–] snooggums@piefed.world 10 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

I have always understood it to mean voting against fascism using a candidate that has a chance of winning instead of throwing away the vote to a third party due to first past the post.

Or expanded "The only way to stop fascism is to vote blue no matter who in the general election." Which isn't a great slogan since some Dems still enable fascists.

[–] null@piefed.nullspace.lol -5 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Which is what it's supposed to mean, but MLs and Anarchist's only seem to hear the "Vote blue" part.

[–] snooggums@piefed.world 5 points 6 days ago

Pretty much anything turned into a slogan loses a significant amount of meaning.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world -4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

True, but they're not going to vote or offer support anyway. So. fuckem. In their worst case scenario Democrats win and advance the goals of H4A, Green New Deal, and (now) rebuilding everything trump destroyed in six months.

[–] Ryanmiller70@lemmy.zip 8 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Love you saying "fuck em", but I can guarantee they'll be who you blame when the Dems lose....again

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world -2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

When they do absolutely nothing but shit on all Dems and don’t have the common sense to even go vote, yeah. I will.

[–] Ryanmiller70@lemmy.zip 5 points 6 days ago (1 children)

So as long as they vote, you're good? Or do they HAVE to vote Dem and not third party?

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world -4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

As long as they vote, I’m good. If they vote third party it’s like not voting, but having voted third party before I’ll allow that sometimes people just fuck up. If they’re voting, fine.

[–] Ryanmiller70@lemmy.zip 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

At least you're somewhat consistent. I started voting third party in 2020, that includes midterms and local elections. I vote every chance I get, but I'm not gonna vote or support a major party that believes in capitalism.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 0 points 6 days ago

Fair enough. Good on you for voting.

[–] pentastarm@piefed.ca 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Even more so when Dem turn out is so fucking low compared to the Reps. But at this point, what can even overcome all the voter apathy? If voting against fascism doesn't do it, I have no idea what will.

[–] Ryanmiller70@lemmy.zip 8 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Putting forward a candidate that stands against genocide and for leftist ideals like M4A, living wages, caps on rent, and government housing.

Stop putting up neolib and you'll see better turnout.