this post was submitted on 16 Nov 2025
36 points (97.4% liked)

Technology

40735 readers
413 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

When then Tropical Storm Melissa was churning south of Haiti, Philippe Papin, a National Hurricane Center (NHC) meteorologist, had confidence it was about to grow into a monster hurricane.

As the lead forecaster on duty, he predicted that in just 24 hours the storm would become a category 4 hurricane and begin a turn towards the coast of Jamaica. No NHC forecaster had ever issued such a bold forecast for rapid strengthening.

But Papin had an ace up his sleeve: artificial intelligence in the form of Google’s new DeepMind hurricane model – released for the first time in June. And, as predicted, Melissa did become a storm of astonishing strength that tore through Jamaica.

Forecasters at the NHC are increasingly leaning hard on Google DeepMind. On the morning of 25 October, Papin explained in his public discussion and on social media that Google’s model was a primary reason he was so confident: “Roughly 40/50 Google DeepMind ensemble members show Melissa becoming a Category 5. While I am not ready to forecast that intensity yet given the track uncertainty, that remains a possibility.

Ironically, AI is getting better at predicting disasters.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] theangriestbird@beehaw.org 7 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Finally, an actually beneficial use case for AI. This is what this technology is good for, pattern predictions based on ridiculously large datasets. But noooo it's new technology so everyone wants to use it to make themselves rich. I hate this world.

[–] smeg@feddit.uk 1 points 1 day ago

Is "AI" just a meaningless buzzword? Like, is there actually anything in common between this hurricane tool, the LLM chatbots, and the image-generation stuff?

[–] Powderhorn@beehaw.org 4 points 3 days ago

Yeah, it actually does change the world. Just not in the way advertised.

[–] locuester@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Yeah that’s how capitalism works. Innovation driven by greed ultimately advances everyone.

[–] theangriestbird@beehaw.org 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

maybe it worked like that at one point. it's clear that it no longer works that way, not when the "innovators" also control all the levers of the economy. Everything is a pump-and-dump scheme these days.

[–] locuester@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 days ago

Yet this post is about how it does work that way. There have always been pump and dumps.

Perhaps marketing and communications has advanced so much that everyone hears about everything and viral pump and dump stuff is far easier to spread.