this post was submitted on 15 Nov 2025
26 points (100.0% liked)

Movies & TV

23728 readers
57 users here now

Rules for Movies & TV Discussion

  1. Any discussion of Disney properties should contain a (cw: imperialism) tag. If your post isn't tagged appropriately it will be removed.

  2. Anti-Bong Joon-ho trolling will result in an immediate ban from c/movies and submitted to the site administrators for review.

  3. On Star Trek Sunday only posts discussing how we might achieve space communism are permitted. Non-Star Trek related content will be removed and you will be temporarily banned until the following Sunday.

Here's a list of tons of leftist movies.

AVATAR 3

Perverts Guide to Ideology

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Just finished the third episode. Early comments were that it was a show about a "woke mind virus" or regular Burgerlander anti-communism, but I'm not so sure now.

spoilerProtagonist had her drunk rant about "why are you so special, you think you're all so great, knowing everything about everyone all the time, the amalgamation of all human knowledge and understanding SO WHAT" etc etc. Paraphrasing obviously.

I'm starting to think that this whole thing might be a big rant from Gilligan about AI. In the sense that it attempts to amalgamate all human knowledge and experience into one giant blob that we all share from together, but at the cost what makes us all unique as human beings.

I could be wrong - it's still early in the show, but that's the vibe I get at this point and it definitely strikes the nerve that Gilligan seems to be feeling at the moment.

They did put a "This show was made by humans" disclaimer at the very beginning, after all.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Sam@hexbear.net 6 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Gilligan has been pretty explicit I believe that the show was not written with AI in mind. I see alot of people drawing this comparison from the newest episode, but honestly I just think no one has any clue where the show is going right now.

[–] thefunkycomitatus@hexbear.net 5 points 4 months ago (1 children)

The core theme of BrBa was pride and how it destroys everything. I can see the theme of this series being cynicism and how to fix it. Like the end goal has to be to make Carol actually happy even if she never ends up as part of the Entity.

[–] Sam@hexbear.net 4 points 4 months ago

Reading one of the interview articles Gilligan sums up the concept as "The most miserable person on Earth must save the world from happiness." From that I can see it going either way, perhaps affirming that negative emotions are a defining characteristic of human life, or the opposite. Carols wife was definitely a sponge for her negative emotions and I think now that the only people she is left with either wont or literally cant handle negativity (For now, I suspect her mirror in Paraguay will show up in some point to give her a taste of her own medicine) she is beginning to spiral. I suspect next episode she will begin to take advantage of the hive mind in an attempt to push it to its limits.

[–] sexywheat@hexbear.net 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Gilligan has been pretty explicit

How?

[–] Sam@hexbear.net 5 points 4 months ago

https://www.polygon.com/pluribus-episode-3-chatgpt-ai-vince-gilligan/

But Vince Gilligan says that wasn’t what he was thinking of when he wrote Pluribus. In fact, when he first came up with the idea for the series, ChatGPT didn’t even exist.

“I wasn't really thinking of AI,” he says, “because this was about eight or 10 years ago. Of course, the phrase ‘artificial intelligence’ certainly predated ChatGPT, but it wasn't in the news like it is now.”

However, Gilligan says that doesn’t invalidate my theory.

“I'm not saying you're wrong,” he continues. “A lot of people are making that connection. I don't want to tell people what this show is about. If it's about AI for a particular viewer, or COVID-19 — it's actually not about that, either — more power to anyone who sees some ripped-from-the-headlines type thing.”

Seehorn takes it one step further, suggesting that the beauty of Gilligan’s work is how well its relatable storytelling maps onto whatever subject the viewer might be grappling with at the moment.

“One of the great things about his shows is that, at their base, they are about human nature,” she says. “He's not writing to themes, he's not writing to specific topics or specific politics or religions or anything. But you are going to bring to it where you're at when you're watching.”