rpg

4389 readers

16 users here now

This community is for meaningful discussions of tabletop/pen & paper RPGs

Rules (wip):

Do not distribute pirate content
Do not incite arguments/flamewars/gatekeeping.
Do not submit video game content unless the game is based on a tabletop RPG property and is newsworthy.
Image and video links MUST be TTRPG related and should be shared as self posts/text with context or discussion unless they fall under our specific case rules.
Do not submit posts looking for players, groups or games.
Do not advertise for livestreams
Limit Self-promotions. Active members may promote their own content once per week. Crowdfunding posts are limited to one announcement and one reminder across all users.
Comment respectfully. Refrain from personal attacks and discriminatory (racist, homophobic, transphobic, etc.) comments. Comments deemed abusive may be removed by moderators.
No Zak S content.
Off-Topic: Book trade, Boardgames, wargames, video games are generally off-topic.
No AI-generated content. Discussion of AI generation pertaining to RPGs is explicitly allowed.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

Avogadro@ttrpg.network

sirblastalot@ttrpg.network

TripHammer@ttrpg.network

Primarch@ttrpg.network

BrentTaylor@ttrpg.network

A Database for WoD Queries (gitlab.com)

submitted 1 month ago by Andonome@lemmy.world to c/rpg@ttrpg.network

9 comments fedilink hide all child comments

This little database has historical events, battles, names, and population totals, because those things are the boring research questions you need to answer for Vampire campaigns and similar.

The database is in plain-text, so you can edit it with notepad or vim. But it's also a relational database. Make of that what you will.

Right now it mostly focuses on Belgrade.

PRs very welcome.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] INeedMana@piefed.zip 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Why not Logseq?

[–] Andonome@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Isn't that a notes app?

[–] INeedMana@piefed.zip 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Depends how one divides note-taking and wiki/knowledge db. I think it's exactly what you are achieving here but would allow for more connectivity between notes

Something happens somewhere  
* tags: 1600, invention, Belgrade  
* [[Organisation]] used [[technology]] to discover [[thing]]

Then each of tags and those in [[]] would have their own pages, with all the references mentioned. You can also enter queries in the body of a note, to have tables with references. Insides are plain markdown, so still text-based and easy to modify. And one could browse the db on the phone. Logseq is open-source too

[–] Andonome@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

would allow for more connectivity between notes

Databases don't have an upper limit of connections.

I'm sure both work fine, but this thing's database-first, as it's meant to deal with queries like 'Events in Belgrade, between 1200 and 1450', or 'random male name from Catalan in 1520'.

[–] INeedMana@piefed.zip 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Yes, but this thing is limited by tags. All the tags you have to put in manually

From your example in the link:

Century: 16
Year: 1521
Location: Belgrade
Tag: War
Event: Siege of Belgrade: Sultan Suleiman the Magnificent conquers Belgrade.

Unless you add Sultan into Tags, you have to query event description too in order to find all the details about Sultan. In Logseq it would be enough to use [[Sultan Suleiman]] in the text and it would behave like another tag

[–] Andonome@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

Those are both manual tagging. One uses tag: sultan, the other uses [[sultan]].

And you can word-search both of them for Sultan.

Of course, if you have use for a WoD wiki, feel free to convert it. I assume Logseq will let people collaborate just as well with git.