this post was submitted on 12 Nov 2025
1204 points (98.9% liked)

Games

43372 readers
2630 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Rules

1. Submissions have to be related to games

Video games, tabletop, or otherwise. Posts not related to games will be deleted.

This community is focused on games, of all kinds. Any news item or discussion should be related to gaming in some way.

2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

No bigotry, hardline stance. Try not to get too heated when entering into a discussion or debate.

We are here to talk and discuss about one of our passions, not fight or be exposed to hate. Posts or responses that are hateful will be deleted to keep the atmosphere good. If repeatedly violated, not only will the comment be deleted but a ban will be handed out as well. We judge each case individually.

3. No excessive self-promotion

Try to keep it to 10% self-promotion / 90% other stuff in your post history.

This is to prevent people from posting for the sole purpose of promoting their own website or social media account.

4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

This community is mostly for discussion and news. Remember to search for the thing you're submitting before posting to see if it's already been posted.

We want to keep the quality of posts high. Therefore, memes, funny videos, low-effort posts and reposts are not allowed. We prohibit giveaways because we cannot be sure that the person holding the giveaway will actually do what they promise.

5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

Make sure to mark your stuff or it may be removed.

No one wants to be spoiled. Therefore, always mark spoilers. Similarly mark NSFW, in case anyone is browsing in a public space or at work.

6. No linking to piracy

Don't share it here, there are other places to find it. Discussion of piracy is fine.

We don't want us moderators or the admins of lemmy.world to get in trouble for linking to piracy. Therefore, any link to piracy will be removed. Discussion of it is of course allowed.

Authorized Regular Threads

Related communities

PM a mod to add your own

Video games

Generic

Help and suggestions

By platform

By type

By games

Language specific

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

No prices yet. I may never financially recover from this.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] PieMePlenty@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago (5 children)

Price will make or break this thing. Rumors going around its gonna be around 1k which is a tall ask for the listed specs. 500, I'd buy it without any promise of any Valve backed VR game and I'm not even big on VR. For the rumored price, I'd need to see more commitment from Valve and latest news right now are saying they aren't developing a VR title.

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago (2 children)

A $1k would break it in this market... The specs suggest a little lower end generally than Quest 3 hardware wise, or in the ballpark (comparable display and optics, lower quality cameras). The only notable improvement is including eye tracking, which is nice, but not $1k nice...

$500 should be a good target, some tradeoffs with Quest 3 (worse 'AR', better eye tracking and PC connectivity).

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 1 points 2 days ago (2 children)

It's a VR headset so no one really cares about the cameras. The only headset with cameras that are any good is on the Apple Pro which is ludicrously expensive. The quest 3s cameras are fine but you can't really read a display while wearing it so they're basically useless for AR stuff.

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

This is more thinking about material cost rather than relative value. If you save money on the passthrough and incur a few costs above the Quest 3 but nothing dramatic, then I'm just saying the pricing needs to be in the ballpark of Quest 3. Better value by making smarter choices that may not have a cost impact (e.g. using a maintstream high end SoC instead of a niche SoC, putting the battery at the back instead of making it front heavy).

Of course they may be hampered by different business needs. Meta affording to risk more money than Valve can risk might drive higher price point, but it would be unfortunate.

[–] vetehinen@lethallava.land 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

@echodot@feddit.uk I don't think that's the determining factor for whether something is useless for AR. AR can be useful even just because it lets you be aware of your surroundings. Then there's the fun of combining real-world objects and structures with virtual ones. Quest 3 can be good for both to some extent.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

My point is that no one really cares about the cameras because this is a VR headset, it isn't trying to be everything to everyone. I also don't really think anyone cares about apple's "spatial computing" (AR), perhaps if they actually had more applications people would be interested, but they don't.

[–] vetehinen@lethallava.land 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

@jj4211@lemmy.world the SoC is better than Quest 3 so that is also a notable improvement. Comfort seems likely to be significantly better than with Quest 3 and default strap. Wireless dongle is included in the price. Will have to wait for reviews to know how some other aspects compare.

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

The SoC may be better, but I don't know that it would be more expensive. Meta went with a more niche SoC and Valve selected a more mainstream, newer SoC. Better specs, but also larger volumes so cost wise I think Valve should be fine. Comfort certainly seems like it should be better, but I don't know that I see more cost as a factor versus just making better decisions.

The wireless dongle certainly can be a thing in it's favor, just thinking that on balance there's some things that should contribute to BOM price and some that should save on BOM price and it should, roughly, be in the ballpark of Quest 3 when all is said and done, not 2x the cost.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Yeah, at about £500 I'd have got one. I don't need the full Steam OS or any of that crap. I just want wireless connection to my PC for streaming.

The use of a second wireless dongle could be a double edged sword as well. Right now I can use a Quest anywhere in the house on Wifi. Works better than wired, in fact. The dongle would limit where I can use it.

[–] DaPorkchop_@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 days ago

I'm sure you can also stream to it over a conventional wifi connection as well, the point of the dongle is so that they can guarantee a direct connection with lower latency and on a dedicated radio frequency to avoid interference, which is especially for non-techies who don't know what they're doing and just expect stuff to work out-of-the-box. The headset is just running SteamOS and has a regular wifi antenna, so I see no reason why you couldn't stream to it using plain old Steam Link or whatever if you already know your connection can handle it.

[–] pinball_wizard@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

For the rumored price, I'd need to see more commitment from Valve and latest news right now are saying they aren't developing a VR title.

Agreed. I feel the same.

But then I start to think about an Indie friendly VR platform might give us in six months. It could be very nice. (The price might look more okay in a year, if this thing incites a VR indie game boom.)

[–] pycorax@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 days ago

I very much doubt it would be 1K, the Index was 1K and they've made it clear that this is not targeting the same premium headset market that the Index was.

[–] utopiah@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

Sadly agree. I've been waiting for years, claiming I'd buy whatever they sell... but honestly right now this would feel like a donation more than something I eagerly want, even less need.

FWIW I'm also NOT the market, I have ... I don't actually know how many but at least 5 XR headsets.