For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.
Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.
Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.
Rule 3: No sectarianism.
Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome
Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.
Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.
Rule 7: Do not individually target federated instances' admins or moderators.
Reading this is actually quite enlightening as this racist windbag basically repeats every racist islamophobic chauvinist talking point I have seen made by "pro-Palestine" anti-resistance westerners.
A very long slopfest of drivel. I have just posted a tiny selection. But if while you read it you find yourself agreeing with aspects of it then maybe its time for self reflection.
"We must protect the women from Hamas" ๐
Okay Bromma shut the hell up.
"Corrupt" is used as such an irritating thought-terminator when it has no meaning by itself. Corrupted by what? The way most people use it is just a marvel-brained "they were good but then they turned evil", i fuckin hate it
Every successful revolution is corrupted, every unsuccessful revolution is pure.
Tenet 1:17 of the nato-"leftist" bible.
Radlibs love doing the thing where the revolution becomes evil because they didnโt hold hands and sing kumbaya with violent frothing fascists who wanted to kill them
You're not supposed to kill the fascists who have been killing you, you're supposed to lower the gun and say something about not being like them, and then they call you a fool and lunge at you one last time but the ground crumbles underneath them and they fall into the lava and still end up dead but without you having to do anything.
I don't know if this is even true because they were falling all over themselves to be first in line to support ISIS taking over Syria
There is definitely an implied "leftist" whenever I say revolution.
Sure but they think it was one.
I believe they know what it was and supported it knowingly, because what they actually support is nato and imperialism. They are not good faith actors.
Some children and young people get deluded. But an "old head" like this is less credulous and the positions they take are done so knowingly in bad faith.
This dude belongs in the same box as Zizek. Not to be trusted under any circumstances. Would be willing to work with Radio Free.
That's probably all correct tbh