Asklemmy

51239 readers

476 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
!lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 6 years ago

MODERATORS

Bloody horror or subtle horror? (lemmy.world)

submitted 2 weeks ago by NONE_dc@lemmy.world to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

7 comments fedilink hide all child comments

If you like horror, whether in literature, movies, video games, etc., what do you prefer? Bloodbaths and gore, or subtlety and nothing explicit?

My Take

I like subtle horror the most, but I can appreciate a good bloodbath if it's well used.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Dyskolos@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 weeks ago

Horror = a supernatural element that is probably evil by nature. Blood or gore don't do shit.

Thinking of stuff like "[REC]" (not the murican remake but the original), "night of the living dead", "evil dead" or even the classic "Blair witch". Horror is (or should be?) more of the things you don't see that might scare. Gore is fine, but it should not the be core (like in slashers).

Sadly I'm totally immune to scares of all kinds in books, movies or games that the whole genre is useless to me.