this post was submitted on 24 Oct 2025
0 points (50.0% liked)

Main, home of the dope ass bear.

16060 readers
265 users here now

THE MAIN RULE: ALL TEXT POSTS MUST CONTAIN "MAIN" OR BE ENTIRELY IMAGES (INLINE OR EMOJI)

(Temporary moratorium on main rule to encourage more posting on main. We reserve the right to arbitrarily enforce it whenever we wish and the right to strike this line and enforce mainposting with zero notification to the users because its funny)

A hexbear.net commainity. Main sure to subscribe to other communities as well. Your feed will become the Lion's Main!

Good comrades mainly sort posts by hot and comments by new!

gun-unity State-by-state guide on maintaining firearm ownership

guaido Domain guide on mutual aid and foodbank resources

smoker-on-the-balcony Tips for looking at financials of non-profits (How to donate amainly)

frothingfash Community-sourced megapost on the main media sources to radicalize libs and chuds with

just-a-theory An Amainzing Organizing Story

feminism Main Source for Feminism for Babies

data-revolutionary Maintaining OpSec / Data Spring Cleaning guide

ussr-cry Remain up to date on what time is it in Moscow

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
liberal@hexbear.net
marxisthayaca@hexbear.net
MiraculousMM@hexbear.net
Koolio@hexbear.net
WhyEssEff@hexbear.net
LENINSGHOSTFACEKILLA@hexbear.net
Alaskaball@hexbear.net
0
reminder! (hexbear.net)
submitted 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) by DylanMc6@hexbear.net to c/main@hexbear.net
70 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

may i remind you that as a left-libertarian:

  1. i support the constitution, despite its flaws, and even the flaws about the founding fathers.
  2. i support limited government within a socialist framework
  3. i'm pretty sure there are revisionists here on hexbear which is fine - everyone has their own opinion, and some (including the people here) have their own taste of socialism/communism.
  4. i do NOT condone the actions of stalin in any way, shape and form - between stalin and trotsky, i'd go with trotsky. he should've succeeded lenin in the 1920s to begin with.
  5. there are democratic and libertarian forms of communism such as/like de leonism, left-communism and even council communism.
  6. i find the idea of a multi-party communist country (like in 'reds! a revolutionary timeline' (you can also find the wiki here (just DON'T vandalize it, and i mean it!), or in nepal through 'people's multiparty democracy') to be interesting.
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] plinky@hexbear.net 8 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

cia infiltrates your country and starts shoveling weapons to local insurgents, wdyd? meow-floppy

you get sieged, and nice little men in free press in very fancy costumes promise that siege will be lifted if you just sell your nice resources to nice fancy men, no biggie, they know what they are doing and will bring prosperity for all? meow-floppy

after providing free education, nice fancy man invite your best specialists and artists with higher salaries, wdyd? meow-floppy

(for my suspicions, i do think some sort of ansyn bottom-up is likelier route inside the usa, cause porkies can't fight something they can't see, but be real about some other stuff inside whole ass countryand society)

[–] FunkyStuff@hexbear.net 4 points 2 weeks ago

In this situation I would support the rights of insurgents to not do bad things and I would emphasize the idea of unity and respect to frustrate the attempt at subversion.

[–] DylanMc6@hexbear.net 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

by "ansyn", do you mean anarcho-syndicalism?

also, i live in the us. if the cia decides to have a coup against the us, the people would fight back. then the cia would get reformed when the people wins.

[–] buckykat@hexbear.net 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The son of a former CIA director became president of the US by a coup in 2000.

[–] DylanMc6@hexbear.net 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

i think the people should've fought back against george w. bush when he won in 2000.

[–] Blakey@hexbear.net 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Okay, but they didn't and likely wouldn't if (when?) it happens again. "Should have" is not really useful, and the more to the point, your answer has already been shown to not work/be incorrect, because it has already happened and things didn't go the way you said they "should". The bourgeoisie "should" step down and let us do FALGSC. Chinese landlords "should" have surrendered their unfairly acquired hoards to the revolution. Things that "should" happen fail to happen all the time.

[–] DylanMc6@hexbear.net 1 points 1 week ago

what are you talking about?