Main, home of the dope ass bear.
THE MAIN RULE: ALL TEXT POSTS MUST CONTAIN "MAIN" OR BE ENTIRELY IMAGES (INLINE OR EMOJI)
(Temporary moratorium on main rule to encourage more posting on main. We reserve the right to arbitrarily enforce it whenever we wish and the right to strike this line and enforce mainposting with zero notification to the users because its funny)
A hexbear.net commainity. Main sure to subscribe to other communities as well. Your feed will become the Lion's Main!
Good comrades mainly sort posts by hot and comments by new!
State-by-state guide on maintaining firearm ownership
Domain guide on mutual aid and foodbank resources
Tips for looking at financials of non-profits (How to donate amainly)
Community-sourced megapost on the main media sources to radicalize libs and chuds with
Main Source for Feminism for Babies
Maintaining OpSec / Data Spring Cleaning guide
Remain up to date on what time is it in Moscow
view the rest of the comments
wat
i consider myself as a left-libertarian because i support individual freedoms (in addition to collectivism),
Do you think you generally find out how you feel about some political issue by imagining how your personal values and experiences could inform an ideal society? You know, like starting from the idea of individual freedom as a goal unto itself, then trying to square existing contradictions using that goal and trying to find solutions to problems that satisfy that value?
Asking because the way you're talking about politics in this thread is pretty different from how people on here usually think about things. We try to first identify the material reality and contradictions that exist in the systems around us, and try to analyze how sectors of society (as delineated by their relationship to the means of production, i.e. are they the havers or the have-nots) are pushed, structurally, into specific actions or behaviors. Then we try to understand what is to be done to bring a possible new world, one without as many of the oppressive systems present in the current one, into existence, but not necessarily a utopia either (because we can identify that the contradictions present in the current world will necessarily be transformed, not just eradicated, when brought to their tipping points). That way, things are always based in a historical process and material reality, not just vague values, morals, or even ideology (not that those things are bad, but they are inherently contextual/local and hard to build a movement that unifies all the workers of all the world when they all have different ideas about them).
I think you probably think the former way because that's just the default in Western discourse, we call it idealism, Enlightenment Idealism, Liberal Idealism, whatever. Most members of the ruling class nowadays are idealists too, but some of the most successful among our enemies were people like Kissinger who don't really care about some utopia they want to build, instead they just do their best to analyze material reality and strategize around the real material threats and the place in history that they occupy. The most successful revolutionary leaders like Lenin, Castro, Ho Chi Minh, Mao, Sankara, etc all did it too.
is it okay you can tell me this again but as a shorter question?
Did you arrive at your ideology by trying to think of something that just vibes well with your personal values, or by synthesizing an observation of your surroundings, history, material conditions, and theory developed by previous revolutionary movements?
i'm pretty sure i'd go with the latter.
i support a synthesis of leftist ideologies (such as/like left communism (de leonism and all), libertarian socialism, social democracy and market socialism) to a point where i can only describe my views as 'left-libertarian'.
my ideology is broken down into four stages (before and after revolution)
before revolution:
after revolution:
second stage: the people collectively own the means of production through a planned market framework - companies and corporations become split and collectivized, some become state-owned - the government runs as a dictatorship of the proletariat through councils with dual power between the parties and the unions, rather than a party-state framework.
third stage: markets become abolished in favor of a participatory economy, money replaced with labor vouchers.
fourth stage: full communism - a classless, moneyless and stateless society.