this post was submitted on 19 Oct 2025
163 points (99.4% liked)

Chapotraphouse

14207 readers
548 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] alexei_1917@hexbear.net 18 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (4 children)

Leave it to Amerikkka to ruin brutalism. If the Soviet Union had built this and stuck a statue of Stalin on top of it, y'all would be big fans of it. It just looks evil because the Evil Empire built it. (And because of over a century of "evil empire" aesthetics in fiction being directly taken from actual Soviet brutalism, communism doesn't have an evil empire aesthetic, Western fiction's evil empires have a communist aesthetic, but that's a whole nother struggle session.) Although I will admit, there are ways to do brutalism right and ways to do it wrong, and... there's a reason I tend to like how the Soviets often did it, but hate a lot of Western attempts. Brutalism's one of those things that capitalists just can't ever get right the way communists can, I guess. (Admittedly, not everything the Soviets ever built looked amazing, but overall they have a way better track record at doing brutalism right than any Western nation.)

[–] WrongOnTheInternet@hexbear.net 23 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It's not brutalism, it's just clad in granite panels.

[–] alexei_1917@hexbear.net 5 points 2 months ago

Precisely my point. They were probably going for brutalism, but they certainly didn't do it correctly.

load more comments (2 replies)