this post was submitted on 16 Oct 2025
64 points (100.0% liked)

technology

24047 readers
261 users here now

On the road to fully automated luxury gay space communism.

Spreading Linux propaganda since 2020

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

PayPal's stablecoin, which it debuted in 2023, is supposed to be redeemable at a 1:1 rate for US dollars. $300 trillion is more than double the entire world's current GDP of $117 trillion. In short, that's a really bad mistake from Paxos.“

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FuckyWucky@hexbear.net 27 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)
[–] sewer_rat_420@hexbear.net 23 points 4 days ago (2 children)

So does this make GDP go up $300T?

[–] barrbaric@hexbear.net 11 points 4 days ago

Economists don't want you to know this one weird trick!

[–] FuckyWucky@hexbear.net 6 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Only if you qualify it as a service worth $300T lol. But really though I don't think it can even be classified as a transfer payment since the IOU is worthless to the issuer.

The joke about economists asking each other to eat dogshit does increase GDP if you qualify eating dogshit as a service. It's why the inclusion of services in GDP is very questionable because of how difficult it is to measure.

Another example would be healthcare, in the US Healthcare is measured in GDP at price you pay for the final service so you get a bloated GDP. In other countries with universal Healthcare it's not directly measured and the sector itself is measured at factor cost (wages, equipment etc).

Yet another one, bank charges eg overdraft fees are included in GDP as a service even though it's closer to a direct tax than a service.

[–] hexthismess@hexbear.net 14 points 4 days ago (1 children)

So the GDP increased by $300t then?

[–] FuckyWucky@hexbear.net 3 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Only if you qualify it as a service worth $300T lol. But really though I don't think it can even be classified as a transfer payment since the IOU is worthless to the issuer.

The joke about economists asking each other to eat dogshit does increase GDP if you qualify eating dogshit as a service. It's why the inclusion of services in GDP is very questionable because of how difficult it is to measure.

Another example would be healthcare, in the US Healthcare is measured in GDP at price you pay for the final service so you get a bloated GDP. In other countries with universal Healthcare it's not directly measured and the sector itself is measured at factor cost (wages, equipment etc).

Yet another one, bank charges eg overdraft fees are included in GDP as a service even though it's closer to a direct tax than a service.