Asklemmy

50887 readers

521 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
!lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 6 years ago

MODERATORS

What is the problem with banning weapons? (piefed.social)

submitted 1 day ago by qtpie@piefed.social to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

55 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Sorry if this is not the place for that kind of discussion. I would like to be civil, please. Some people on Reddit were talking about how only dictators would want to disarm people.

Can I have some explanation on your opinion and why? I believe weapons should be banned and that crime should not exist in the first place. My opinion may change, but I believe there should somehow be strict rules regarding crime to reduce the amount of it and just have a place where it will not be worried about.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] BarrelsBallot@lemmygrad.ml 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This is a difficult topic because on the one hand I don't believe banning weapons addresses the root problems of violence in the first place (access to automatic weapons in the USA has decreased yet mass shooting are way up), but at the same time recent events have shown that despite being the most armed populace in the world, U.S americans refuse to even lift a finger while people are being ripped off the streets and shoved through concentration camps.

An armed people can still be a docile people.

I will mention though, even with bans- it is extremely easy to produce automatic firearms both conventional and 3-printed. I'm not convinced that a ban would be effective at hindering mass shooters in the U.S. We can bring up the statistics of other countries that lack the same firearm access of the US but I'm not sure those are apples to apples comparisons given the differences in material conditions.

[–] wuphysics87@lemmy.ml 2 points 9 hours ago

Apropos of nothing, doesn't reducing ease of access to something inherently hinder the use of it? Here, if you are reduced to having to 3d print or cast steel to have a weapon, isn't that hindering use? Material conditions.