Slop.

760 readers

644 users here now

For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target federated instances' admins or moderators.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

127

submitted 3 months ago by Posadas@hexbear.net to c/slop@hexbear.net

75 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] LeeeroooyJeeenkiiins@hexbear.net 8 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I'm just sayin' if the foreskin is so unnecessary for some people why haven't they snipped the problem at the root- its DNA

[–] WildWeezing420@hexbear.net 18 points 3 months ago (1 children)

there must be foreskins for the foreskin god.

[–] LeeeroooyJeeenkiiins@hexbear.net 7 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Is the foreskin god the one that wants the circumcisions or is it his enemy

[–] WildWeezing420@hexbear.net 7 points 3 months ago

old testament vs new testament

[–] BodyBySisyphus@hexbear.net 10 points 3 months ago (1 children)

'cause then how would you pay homage to the prepuce-obsessed deity that you worship?

[–] LeeeroooyJeeenkiiins@hexbear.net 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Wouldn't genetically writing the foreskin from existence count as infinite circumcisions though

[–] ShimmeringKoi@hexbear.net 6 points 3 months ago

Or would it count as thwarting infinite circumcisions?