this post was submitted on 08 Oct 2025
191 points (99.5% liked)

Android

32049 readers
145 users here now

DROID DOES

Welcome to the droidymcdroidface-iest, Lemmyest (Lemmiest), test, bestest, phoniest, pluckiest, snarkiest, and spiciest Android community on Lemmy (Do not respond)! Here you can participate in amazing discussions and events relating to all things Android.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules


1. All posts must be relevant to Android devices/operating system.


2. Posts cannot be illegal or NSFW material.


3. No spam, self promotion, or upvote farming. Sources engaging in these behavior will be added to the Blacklist.


4. Non-whitelisted bots will be banned.


5. Engage respectfully: Harassment, flamebaiting, bad faith engagement, or agenda posting will result in your posts being removed. Excessive violations will result in temporary or permanent ban, depending on severity.


6. Memes are not allowed to be posts, but are allowed in the comments.


7. Posts from clickbait sources are heavily discouraged. Please de-clickbait titles if it needs to be submitted.


8. Submission statements of any length composed of your own thoughts inside the post text field are mandatory for any microblog posts, and are optional but recommended for article/image/video posts.


Community Resources:


We are Android girls*,

In our Lemmy.world.

The back is plastic,

It's fantastic.

*Well, not just girls: people of all gender identities are welcomed here.


Our Partner Communities:

!android@lemmy.ml


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] cRazi_man@europe.pub 20 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Does this undermine Googles plans to block side loading?

[–] disevani@lemmy.world 18 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Well, if i can download a F-droid app via Playstore... then i'm basically not "sideloading" anything. This could be interesting!

But the whole (paid) 'verification' thing still is troubling tho. And we know Google; they are good at breaking things one way or another.

[–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

A lot of apk devs of nice little unique and often free apks are made by people who aren't going to want to hand over there identification and private info to Google in order to be verified.

[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 1 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

I mean, they can still send the code to F-Droid and F-Droid can sign it under their banner. F-Droid doesn't have to do ID verification.

[–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

There is no "under f-droids banner". Any apk under any store or no store at all gets its check through google.

[–] spacelord@sh.itjust.works 9 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

My thoughts exactly. That could be very comfy for us users, but many devs will be (and justifiably so) wary of verifying themselves.

[–] DaddleDew@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

If I understand well, even if you were able to install F-droid through the store (which you can't because Google doesn't like it), you won't be able to install apps with F-droid anyway if they implement this.

[–] relativestranger@feddit.nl 8 points 2 days ago

that's why they're pushing to lock down the devices themselves.. that's outside the scope of the ruling.

[–] disevani@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

Google has to allow other app stores in Google Play Store in 2026, if Google likes it or not is not relevant.

And yes, the question remains if you can download from F-droid after installing through PlayStore, i agree with you there (because of the verification thing). It depents on what the court thinks 'sideloading' is, since we already know what Google think it means...