this post was submitted on 05 Oct 2025
216 points (99.1% liked)

UK Politics

4552 readers
395 users here now

General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both !uk_politics@feddit.uk and !unitedkingdom@feddit.uk .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] stsquad@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 months ago (3 children)

If there are no more landlords then there is no more private renting? Where will people be able to live while they build up a deposit?

[–] Mongostein@lemmy.ca 19 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Public renting, not for profit

[–] stsquad@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Great. Who is renting out all these houses?

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 14 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Never heard of council houses? I know Thatcher sold off most of them but a few still exist. Right to buy is terrible.

[–] stsquad@lemmy.ml -1 points 3 months ago

Yep. Currently very oversubscribed so you'll need to build more. How much are the greens planning to invest in the council house estate while they roll back private landlords?

[–] Schal330@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

It would typically be the local council of that particular area.

[–] Mongostein@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Ask them, I’m not in the UK.

I would assume a non-partisan government entity of some sort. The same way public utilities or public health care is handled.

[–] Oppopity@lemmygrad.ml 10 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Break the house price into weekly deposits so that after 20 years you then own the house.

Basically renting should give you a percentage of ownership instead of just going to the landlord.

[–] stsquad@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I mean that's what a mortgage is. Who's underwriting that?

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 3 points 3 months ago

The renter has no role in a mortgage.

[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Welllll

Carla Denyer, Green MP for Bristol Central, sought to stress that despite the motions "eye-catching" title, "it does not actually 'abolish' landlords".

For starters.

This is to make investment properties and landbanking less attractive. There will still be landlords. But slumlords and opportunists will be less attracted.

And it's also allowing:

[...] give councils the Right to Buy when landlords sell properties, when the property doesn’t meet insulation standards, or when a property has been vacant for more than six months.

So that also partially answers your question about council housing numbers.

All there in the article

[–] stsquad@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Having lived in a badly insulated rental I've often thought there should be some sort of incentive to encourage landlords to improve the energy efficiency of their properties. How to frame a tax that didn't immediately get passed onto the tenants?

[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 3 points 3 months ago

In Vic we have "minimum standards" as part of our reforms. Property has to meet them. It's still gradually improving, the big issue is our tenants tribunal is backlogged and needs a fuckton more resources