The ex-Fox News host railed against decades of work to diversify the all-volunteer military as he announced initiatives to effectively exclude women from combat roles and relax protections against hazing and bullying of troops
More than 800 of America’s top military leaders sat silent and showed no reaction as ex-Fox News presenter turned Pentagon boss Pete Hegseth told them he was issuing a series of new directives that will make it harder for women to serve in combat and easier for personnel to engage in hazing and bullying without repercussions during an unprecedented gathering of flag-rank officers at a Marine Corps base in Virginia on Tuesday.
The Secretary of War — a title not used by the head of the U.S. military establishment since 1947 but revived by President Donald Trump earlier this month — told the group of admirals, generals, and their senior enlisted advisers he was “ending the war on warriors” and complained that too many of their peers had been put in their roles “for the wrong reasons” including their race and gender.
Standing in front of a large American flag backdrop, he attacked by name several of the leaders’ retired peers, telling them that the department’s “compass heading” was “clear.”
“Out with the Chiarelli, the McKenzies and the Milleys and in with the Stockdales the Schwartzkopfs and the Pattons,” he said, denigrating former Army Vice Chief of Staff General Peter Chiarelli, ex-U.S. Central Command commander and Marine Corps General Kenneth McKenzie Jr, and ex-Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman and Army General Mark Milley, each of whom has been critical of Trump or his administration.
“The sooner we have the right people, the sooner we can advance the right policies,” he added.
Hegseth also groused about efforts to open up combat roles to women and initiatives to “weed out so-called toxic leaders” and blamed “foolish and reckless” politicians for having “set the wrong compass” and causing the Pentagon to lose its way.
Hegseth, an Iraq War veteran who attained the rank of Major in the Army National Guard but became a critic of the Pentagon’s efforts to open up military service to women, racial minorities and LGBT+ persons, said the War Department must “restore a ruthless, dispassionate and common sense application of standards” that are “uniform, gender neutral and high.”
He told the assembled leaders he was issuing a directive to ensure that “every designated Combat Arms” role across all branches “returns to the highest male standard only,” all but reversing a 2015 directive from then-Defense Secretary Ashton Carter to open all combat roles to women.
“If you do not meet the male level physical standards for combat positions ... it's time for a new position or a new profession,” he said. “If women can make it excellent. If not, it is what it is. If that means no women qualify for some combat jobs, so be it.”
The War Secretary also claimed — without offering evidence — that the Pentagon had lowered standards “to hit racial quotas as well” and said the revised standards he was promulgating are based on what he called the “1990 test,” which compares today’s standards to those in 1990, a time when women were barred from combat roles and LGBT+ persons were banned from serving.
“The 1990s test is simple. What were the military standards in 1990 and if they have changed, tell me why was it a necessary change based on the evolving landscape of combat, or was the change due to a softening, weakening or gender based pursuit of other priorities? 1990s seems to be as good a place to start as any,” he said.
Ukraine is in a situation where a war is either being run well, or Ukraine doesn't exit. There's no real third option. The U.S., on the other hand, could run a war badly for decades with it's wealth and geographic isolation propping it up.
If that's your personal opinion, that's fine and cool. The idea that nobody actually living in Ukraine gets to evaluate the quality of their leadership or the relative appeal of their civil ministers until some kind of peace accord is struck (with the presumable caveat that there can never be peace until the whole country is retaken, I guess?) leaves you with a country governed by military dictatorship indefinitely.
Aside from the more obvious reasons, the nagging fact that Bush didn't pounce on 9/11 to make himself Prez 4 Lyfe suggests they weren't properly prepared to exploit the attack for their own benefit.
But we're looking at the wages of the Long War as we speak. All our wealth and geographic insulation isn't saving us from the harsh economic realities of endless conflict. We've got a nation flush with unemployed veterans who are leaping at the chance to join the Trump Gestapo for a six figure salary. We've got an admin stuffed to the brim full of FOX News talking heads, because none of them have "Lost One Too Many Battles" branded on their resumes. Our economy is increasingly seven tech oligarchies in trench coats, trading the same trillion dollar check back and forth between them to give the appearance of growth, even as they've been laying off their best and brightest and consolidating their business around a model of digital landlordism.
All of this can be traced back to our decision to burn the livelihoods of millions of Americans and trillions in productive capital on an endless war. Trump is us paying the interest on that enormous debt.
And the only thing that kept us from getting to 2025 faster was twelve years of Presidents who gradually and painstakingly extracted us from those conflicts overseas. That was the value of the last twelve election cycles.
Ukraine doesn't have our runway and its burning up a lot faster than the US did after 9/11. Plenty of people on the ground see this for what it is. The Ukraine that existed before 2022 (really, before 2014) is fully evaporated. What we have now is this husk, being torn at by two global military factions.
So maybe elections don't really matter anymore anyway. Democracy in Ukraine died when the pogroms began.