Virginia governor pardons man whose arrest at a school board meeting galvanized conservatives (apnews.com)

submitted 1 year ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

16 comments fedilink hide all child comments

The father of a Virginia student sexually assaulted in her high school bathroom has been pardoned after his arrest two years ago protesting a school board meeting became a flashpoint in the conservative push to increase parental involvement in public education.

Virginia Republican Gov. Glenn Youngkin announced on Fox News Sunday that he had pardoned Scott Smith of his disorderly conduct conviction stemming from the June 2021 incident. The episode featured prominently throughout the gubernatorial campaign that year for Youngkin, who has made support for the so-called “parents’ rights” movement a cornerstone of his political brand.

“Scott Smith is a dedicated parent who’s faced unwarranted charges in his pursuit to protect his daughter,” Youngkin said Sunday in a press release. “Scott’s commitment to his child despite the immense obstacles is emblematic of the parental empowerment movement that started in Virginia.”

According to Loudoun Now, Smith threatened to kick out the teeth of deputies who dragged him away from a Loudoun County School Board meeting over state-mandated protections for transgender students. The local news outlet reported that he had argued loudly, clenched his fist and sworn at a woman while demanding answers over the handling of his daughter’s assault.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

That is not equivalent. A genderfluid person assaulting his daughter, awful as that is, is not a systemic problem like police violence. It says nothing about genderfluid or trans people as a whole.

[-] Tedesche@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Fair point on a societal level, but I don’t think that would matter to a father of an abused daughter. I still think empathy is warranted.

[-] mo_ztt@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Empathy, I 100% agree with. I think the father in that situation should get a lot of leeway for getting overly emotional in his response. And I think I remember that the court system actually did do that: Gave him recognition of the fact that he was generally a good citizen who had a good explanation for why he lost his shit, and gave him probation and dismissed some of the charges.

I do also think the woman who he was in the argument with in the school board meeting has a right to her own safety and to say what she wants to say without somebody threatening her, whatever their reasons. I also think that it's relevant what is best for his daughter. I think usually that reaction of "something happened to my daughter so I'm gonna get violent against unrelated people" does more harm than good overall. Being solid and emotionally stable is usually the best thing you can do for your family whatever happens, even if it's easier said than done.

IDK, I'm not trying to sit in judgement of the guy. Like I say, I get it.

this post was submitted on 11 Sep 2023

93 points (96.0% liked)

politics

19229 readers

2356 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News